From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Minu Jin <s9430939@naver.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org,
abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com, zxcv2569763104@gmail.com,
milospuric856@gmail.com, karanja99erick@gmail.com,
weibu@redadmin.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read()
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 16:40:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa16641f-d6b2-47e8-b1a9-08d63387c733@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ah955alcKpjMXYXy@ashevche-desk.local>
On 03/06/2026 03:48, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 09:30:01PM +0300, Bitterblue Smith wrote:
>> On 27/01/2026 17:38, Minu Jin wrote:
>>> This series improves error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() and cleans up
>>> the code style to comply with kernel standards.
>>>
>>> 1. The first patch combines the logic change and caller updates.
>>> The function change and the caller updates must be in the same
>>> patch. If they are separated, the code will not work correctly
>>> or will cause errors at that specific point in the history.
>>>
>>> 2. The second patch focuses purely on code style cleanup (changing uint
>>> to unsigned int) as requested by Andy Shevchenko.
>>>
>>> Regarding the logic change in _rtw_pktfile_read():
>>>
>>> The original code used a ternary operator to read whatever data was
>>> available, even if it was less than requested. This could lead to
>>> callers processing incomplete data without knowing it.
>>>
>>> I have changed this to return -EINVAL when the remaining data is insufficient.
>>> This is safer because most callers expect the exact amount of data and
>>> should not proceed with a partial read.
>>>
>>> Testing and Verification:
>>>
>>> I do not have access to the physical RTL8723BS hardware. However, I have
>>> performed a rigorous manual audit of the data path and verified the
>>> changes using Smatch static analysis. The analysis confirmed that no
>>> new warnings or logical regressions were introduced in the modified files.
>>
>> I have some bad news:
>>
>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=313401
>
> It's unclear that this patch made it happen. See below.
>
It looks pretty clear to me, but okay. I forwarded your request for bisection.
>> [quote]
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I recently upgraded my system, and now I’m having a strange issue with my
>> WiFi (Realtek RTL8723BS).
>>
>> now I can no longer connect to any WiFi networks as a client. however,
>> creating an Access Point (AP) still works fine, but whenever I try to connect
>> to an existing network, the connection fails.
>>
>> dmesg logs:
>> Every time I attempt a connection, dmesg gets spammed with this error:
>>
>> [ 1083.925640] rtl8723bs mmc0:0001:1 wlan0: xmit_xmitframes: coalesce failed with error -22
>> [ 1084.921217] rtl8723bs mmc0:0001:1 wlan0: xmit_xmitframes: coalesce failed with error -22
>> [ 1085.921434] rtl8723bs mmc0:0001:1 wlan0: xmit_xmitframes: coalesce failed with error -22
>> [ 1086.922320] rtl8723bs mmc0:0001:1 wlan0: xmit_xmitframes: coalesce failed with error -22
>> ....
>>
>> Has anyone encountered this specific "coalesce" error with the rtl8723bs
>> driver? I'm looking for advice on whether this is a known bug in recent
>> kernels or if there's a specific module parameter I should try to bypass
>> this.
>>
>> System Info:
>>
>> Chipset: RTL8723BS (SDIO)
>>
>> Kernel version: 7.0.3-zen1-2-zen
>>
>> update: I fixed the issue after kernel downgrade
>>
>> [/quote]
>
> That guy should bisect and find the culprit. It will help a lot to understand
> what's going on.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 15:38 [PATCH v8 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
2026-01-27 15:38 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: update _rtw_pktfile_read() to return error codes Minu Jin
2026-01-27 15:38 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: clean up _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
2026-05-24 18:30 ` [PATCH v8 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() Bitterblue Smith
2026-06-03 0:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-03 13:40 ` Bitterblue Smith [this message]
2026-06-03 14:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-04 21:47 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-06-05 5:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa16641f-d6b2-47e8-b1a9-08d63387c733@gmail.com \
--to=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
--cc=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=karanja99erick@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=milospuric856@gmail.com \
--cc=s9430939@naver.com \
--cc=weibu@redadmin.org \
--cc=zxcv2569763104@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox