From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4612F34 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 10:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4EE23A; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 03:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from donnerap.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE2B13F792; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 03:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:19:06 +0100 From: Andre Przywara To: Samuel Holland Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linus Walleij , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/7] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: Add H616 EMAC compatible Message-ID: <20220705111906.3c553f23@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20220701112453.2310722-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20220701112453.2310722-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> Organization: ARM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 18:53:14 -0500 Samuel Holland wrote: Hi Samuel, > On 7/1/22 6:24 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > > The Allwinner H616 contains an "EMAC" Ethernet MAC compatible to the A64 > > version. > >=20 > > Add it to the list of compatible strings. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >=20 > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t= -emac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ema= c.yaml > > index 6a4831fd3616c..87f1306831cc9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac.y= aml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-emac.y= aml > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties: > > - enum: > > - allwinner,sun20i-d1-emac > > - allwinner,sun50i-h6-emac > > + - allwinner,sun50i-h616-emac =20 >=20 > The H616 manual has register fields for an internal PHY, like H3. Are the= se not > hooked up for either EMAC? Which register fields do you mean, exactly? The H616 uses the same internal PHY solution as the H6: an AC200 die co-packaged on the carrier (or whatever integration solution they actually chose). The difference to the H6 is that EMAC0 is hardwired to the external RGMII pins, whereas EMAC1 is hardwired to the internal AC200 RMII pins. =46rom all I could see that does not impact the actual MAC IP: both are the same as in the H6, or A64, for that matter. There is one twist, though: the second EMAC uses a separate EMAC clock register in the syscon. I came up with this patch to support that: https://github.com/apritzel/linux/commit/078f591017794a0ec689345b0eeb715090= 8cf85a That extends the syscon to take an optional(!) index. So EMAC0 works exactly like before (both as "<&syscon>;", or "<&syscon 0>;", but for EMAC1 we need the index: "<&syscon 4>;". But in my opinion this should not affect the MAC binding, at least not for MAC0. And I think we should get away without a different compatible string for EMAC1, since the MAC IP is technically the same, it's just the connection that is different. In any case I think this does not affect the level of support we promise today: EMAC0 with an external PHY only. Cheers, Andre >=20 > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-emac > > =20 > > reg: > > =20 >=20