From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: Add Baijie HelperBoard A133 compatible
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 17:34:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260511-startup-subside-343d9f8352f4@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d51ab76d9f658aad542fa24651d1083e31628038.camel@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2300 bytes --]
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 06:18:22PM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Mon, 2026-05-11 at 17:08 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > Baijie HelperBoard A133 is a development board around their A133 Core
> > > board. Introduce a compatible for both the Core and the development
> > > boards.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changelog:
> > > v2:
> > > - introduced baijie,helper-a133-core compatible for the Core (SoM) board
> > >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 11 +++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > index e6443c266fa1..d7b9dec81165 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > > @@ -96,6 +96,17 @@ properties:
> > > - const: allwinner,ba10-tvbox
> > > - const: allwinner,sun4i-a10
> > >
> > > +
> > > + - description: HelperBoardA133 Core
> > > + items:
> > > + - const: baijie,helper-a133-core
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100
> >
> > Does this make sense? Can the core board be used without a carrier?
>
> such operation would be impractical at least, that's why in my v1
> Core board didn't have its own compatible. Maybe I didn't understand
> you correctly.
I just wanted a comaptible for the SoM, so that there's a common
compatible for that if it ends up on another carrier. IIRC these Baijie
folks had another one on their site, but may be misremembering.
>
> Shall I drop the above 4 lines, the compatible property from the
> root in sun50i-a133-baije-core.dtsi and only leave
> sun50i-a133-baijie-helper.dtb with 3-strings compatible as it is
> now in v2?
> > > + - description: Baijie Helper A133
> > > + items:
> > > + - const: baijie,helper-a133
> > > + - const: baijie,helper-a133-core
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100
What I wanted was just this, so trim it down to that and you can add
my Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
~heers,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-10 20:16 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for Baijie Helper A133 board Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-10 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Shenzhen Baijie Technology Co., Ltd Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-10 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: Add Baijie HelperBoard A133 compatible Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-11 16:08 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-11 16:18 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-11 16:34 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-05-10 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: allwinner: A133: add support for Baijie Helper A133 board Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-11 11:44 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260511-startup-subside-343d9f8352f4@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox