ARM Sunxi Platform Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vojtěch Krátký" <vo.kratky@seznam.cz>
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] iio: adc: change from %ld to %pe for PTR_ERR() printing
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 12:12:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604121251.2BB881F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604120201.116925-3-vo.kratky@seznam.cz>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Direct return on devm_thermal_of_zone_register failure skips critical error cleanup (PM leak and Use-After-Free).
- [High] Unbalanced disable_irq() on sun4i_prepare_for_irq() error path permanently disables the IRQ.
--

commit 4c81144898d1e91a3f1c0bfb6354a6f38c7251b4
Author: Vojtěch Krátký <vo.kratky@seznam.cz>

iio: adc: change from %ld to %pe for PTR_ERR() printing

This commit replaces numeric PTR_ERR() logging with the %pe format specifier.
The goal is to print error values in a more readable form.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c b/drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c
> index 479115ea50bf9..5d7a61abcaeae 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -639,8 +639,8 @@ static int sun4i_gpadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		 */
>  		if (IS_ERR(info->tzd) && PTR_ERR(info->tzd) != -ENODEV) {
>  			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> -				"could not register thermal sensor: %ld\n",
> -				PTR_ERR(info->tzd));
> +				"could not register thermal sensor: %pe\n",
> +				info->tzd);
>  			return PTR_ERR(info->tzd);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but returning directly here
skips the err_map cleanup label.

If devm_thermal_of_zone_register() fails with an error other than -ENODEV,
this code returns directly. Does this leave the device's runtime PM enabled
because the pm_runtime_disable() call in the err_map block is skipped?

Also, if the device was probed via sun4i_gpadc_probe_mfd(),
iio_map_array_register() was successfully called earlier:

drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c:sun4i_gpadc_probe_mfd() {
    ...
    ret = iio_map_array_register(indio_dev, sun4i_gpadc_hwmon_maps);
    ...
}

By skipping iio_map_array_unregister() at the err_map label, does this
leave a dangling pointer in the global IIO maps pointing to indio_dev?
Since indio_dev is managed by devres (devm_iio_device_alloc), its memory
will be freed immediately upon probe failure. Could this result in a
use-after-free when another subsystem attempts to read from the map?

>  		}
>  	}

While reviewing this file, I also noticed another pre-existing regression in
sun4i_gpadc_read().

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the unbalanced disable_irq() on the
sun4i_prepare_for_irq() error path permanently disable the IRQ?

drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c:sun4i_gpadc_read() {
    ...
    ret = sun4i_prepare_for_irq(indio_dev, channel, irq);
    if (ret)
        goto err;

    enable_irq(irq);
    ...
err:
    pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(indio_dev->dev.parent);
    disable_irq(irq);
    mutex_unlock(&info->mutex);
}

If sun4i_prepare_for_irq() fails, the code jumps to the err label and
unconditionally executes disable_irq(irq). Because enable_irq(irq) was never
reached, this increases the IRQ disable depth. 

Since the IRQs are initially requested with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN
(initial depth = 1), the unbalanced disable_irq() bumps the depth to 2.
On subsequent successful reads, enable_irq() will only decrement the depth
back to 1. Does this leave the IRQ permanently masked, causing
wait_for_completion_timeout() to continually time out?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604120201.116925-1-vo.kratky@seznam.cz?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260604120201.116925-1-vo.kratky@seznam.cz>
2026-06-04 11:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] iio: adc: change from %ld to %pe for PTR_ERR() printing Vojtěch Krátký
2026-06-04 12:12   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-13  8:06   ` Jernej Škrabec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260604121251.2BB881F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vo.kratky@seznam.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox