ARM Sunxi Platform Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "James Hilliard" <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	lee@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev,
	robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] mfd: ac200: Add X-Powers AC200 support
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 19:40:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902194008.8FF2A1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-submit-ac200-mfd-v8-2-2aa06720b8ac@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditional global chip reset in shutdown/remove breaks RTC wake, Wake-on-LAN, and live PHY state.
--

commit d8592c963caa9b21487926208ea5815e059be1be
Author: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>

mfd: ac200: Add X-Powers AC200 support
    
This commit adds support for the X-Powers AC200 mixed-signal companion IC.
It enables the shared input clock, initializes the paged regmap, and asserts
a chip reset during probe, driver removal, and system shutdown.

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ac200.c b/drivers/mfd/ac200.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..8445a460ef6c2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ac200.c

[ ... ]

> +static void ac200_disable(struct regmap *regmap)
> +{
> +	regmap_write(regmap, AC200_SYS_CONTROL_REG, 0);
> +}

[Severity: High]
Does asserting a global chip reset here wipe the hardware state of all
co-packaged functions, including the RTC and Fast Ethernet PHY?

Since ac200_disable() is unconditionally called by ac200_shutdown() and
ac200_remove(), could this kill the PHY and clear the RTC during system
shutdown, breaking Wake-on-LAN and Wake-on-RTC from power-off states?

Furthermore, because the PHY is enumerated separately on the MDIO bus and
only references this MFD via a phandle, will unbinding the AC200 driver at
runtime (via ac200_remove) forcefully reset the PHY hardware out from under
the active MDIO PHY driver and lead to unpredictable network failures?

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902-submit-ac200-mfd-v8-0-2aa06720b8ac@gmail.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 19:28 [PATCH v8 0/2] mfd: add X-Powers AC200 support James Hilliard
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: x-powers: Add AC200 James Hilliard
2026-09-02 19:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] mfd: ac200: Add X-Powers AC200 support James Hilliard
2026-09-02 19:40   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-03  8:39     ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260902194008.8FF2A1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox