From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Felix Gu" <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: clean up on thermal zone registration failure
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 16:08:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906160855.964E71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906-gpadc-v1-2-92d3dc8ef355@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] pm_runtime_disable() is called manually before devm-managed subsystems are unregistered, exposing a window where callbacks run with runtime PM disabled.
- [High] The driver ignores the return value of pm_runtime_get_sync(), which can lead to accessing hardware registers while the device is suspended or powered off.
--
commit 0cc8a4f7ab93d097709950676951a80ac9c05108
Author: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: clean up on thermal zone registration failure
If devm_thermal_of_zone_register() fails, probe returns without
unregistering the IIO map array or disabling runtime PM.
Jump to err_map to release them.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c b/drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c
> index 85382e435f2a7..ac5ba76b979e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c
> @@ -638,10 +638,10 @@ static int sun4i_gpadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * thermal because no thermal DT node is found.
> */
> if (IS_ERR(info->tzd) && PTR_ERR(info->tzd) != -ENODEV) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "could not register thermal sensor: %ld\n",
> - PTR_ERR(info->tzd));
> - return PTR_ERR(info->tzd);
> + ret = dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev,
> + PTR_ERR(info->tzd),
> + "could not register thermal sensor\n");
> + goto err_map;
> }
> }
>
> ret = devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register the device\n");
> goto err_map;
> }
>
> return 0;
>
> err_map:
> if (!info->no_irq && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THERMAL_OF))
> iio_map_array_unregister(indio_dev);
>
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does explicitly calling pm_runtime_disable()
here create a window where the devres-managed thermal zone and IIO devices are
still registered while runtime PM is disabled?
Since devm_thermal_of_zone_register() and devm_iio_device_register() are used,
devres will not unregister them until after the probe error path returns.
In the interim, if the thermal core's polling thread invokes .get_temp() or
userspace reads IIO sysfs, could this access hardware while clocks are
disabled, triggering a synchronous external abort?
A similar pre-existing issue appears in sun4i_gpadc_remove():
drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c:sun4i_gpadc_remove() {
struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct sun4i_gpadc_iio *info = iio_priv(indio_dev);
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
...
}
Is pm_runtime_disable() being called here before devres tears down the
registered IIO and thermal zones?
There is another pre-existing issue where return values for
pm_runtime_get_sync() are not checked before accessing hardware. Can this lead
to accessing hardware registers while the device is suspended or powered off?
If pm_runtime_get_sync() fails (e.g., due to runtime PM being disabled during
the teardown race from err_map or remove, or a genuine PM failure), it returns
a negative error code but regmap accesses proceed anyway:
drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c:sun4i_prepare_for_irq() {
...
pm_runtime_get_sync(indio_dev->dev.parent);
reinit_completion(&info->completion);
ret = regmap_write(info->regmap, SUN4I_GPADC_INT_FIFOC,
...
}
And also in sun4i_gpadc_temp_read():
drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.c:sun4i_gpadc_temp_read() {
struct sun4i_gpadc_iio *info = iio_priv(indio_dev);
if (info->no_irq) {
pm_runtime_get_sync(indio_dev->dev.parent);
regmap_read(info->regmap, SUN4I_GPADC_TEMP_DATA, val);
...
}
Should the return value of pm_runtime_get_sync() be checked to avoid a bus
fault or kernel panic when reading or writing to unpowered MMIO registers?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260906-gpadc-v1-0-92d3dc8ef355@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 15:58 [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: two fixes Felix Gu
2026-09-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: drop underflowing pm_runtime_put() calls Felix Gu
2026-09-06 16:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: clean up on thermal zone registration failure Felix Gu
2026-09-06 16:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: two fixes Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260906160855.964E71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ustc.gu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox