From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364C145FFAD; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789037379; cv=none; b=MCJcDP2EQGGpNR1RJKBuQFnBtdtUQL09tpI0q4UDSeqdpHGNF70rM4QiqMVQpNdMI7RIV6TMlR7z6Dxqe77ZE/RsrC7gSOp0syehsvrPLWdIMwmLyj32oE7+CoWQnJFewSvPzjdpcD1a8nO82TOjyiZJFA8SCYXyVkKSDEGO9Rk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789037379; c=relaxed/simple; bh=awYSPn9JddielGm09gBj22jAkXBv0oqeCwPZITWyxWM=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=spU1ik24js+GS17kujy+W2w0HTMDrwnysFK9aMbK+nYOQYQgM04DZcMAfJ5/O6y1oLnw4WmxwJcDaJQvDuAyWyZmnnKpUp/GZL0TTuaS9rfi3mZMtsOMYF4EFfzjdpgFTlbjzgUXBGF46YIO6P4eX1fUX8PiT5DyIghYu6WxBXQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=b5EuqU3U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="b5EuqU3U" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E8551F000FF; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:49:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789037376; bh=awYSPn9JddielGm09gBj22jAkXBv0oqeCwPZITWyxWM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=b5EuqU3U3LAPQp3VW6K4Dimzi75nnLXkFCBizWQkdj8QW3sMU4JH1F0WB0+3/Z4F1 hiQQHs/zWGPI1jOV/o+lX39S6L9IMaFnaGYQrA1cZrNeUhXk3Szr/eaGWBVvHUJNpU 1x6Jni/5uCGJlWkoo/Oy45omQqgMPYftZpkF90BQHn8V+8E2P+KCYbATHWZVuG8Dk2 gpud+vVoftXKPR4VhhbiNSAU+CF7nmVJ2PqquAjRgeCgquBI+lMs9LwrAQxT50X9Ia dE4YsJg6+E2CEujKMBDJKF7IgJkUhaz3mOPznRbUcOa7koh29yPBi1CbwMLW6G5aCu bSxRZAe4Fcxvw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] mfd: axp20x: Constify axp313 and axp717 cells Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Jerome Brunet" Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, mfd@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260910-axp318-regulator-v8-1-e906a61a7f3d@baylibre.com> References: <20260910-axp318-regulator-v8-0-e906a61a7f3d@baylibre.com> <20260910-axp318-regulator-v8-1-e906a61a7f3d@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:49:35 +0000 Message-Id: <20260910104936.7E8551F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > mfd_cells array should generally be const and there does not seem to be > anything against it for the axp313 and axp717. >=20 > Constify the mfd_cells array for the axp313 and axp717 to be consistent > with the other supported chips >=20 > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260910-axp318-reg= ulator-v8-0-e906a61a7f3d@baylibre.com?part=3D1