ARM Sunxi Platform Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wentao Liang" <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: Fix pdev reference leak in sun8i_r40_tcon_tv_set_mux()
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:30:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916183028.17C6D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916182412.2091681-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] drm/sun4i: misapplied patch causes build failure
--

commit 576ab0ea69ae3e401d6153bcb00f1e660850ae75
Author: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>

drm/sun4i: Fix pdev reference leak in sun8i_r40_tcon_tv_set_mux()

This commit attempts to fix a claimed reference leak in the success path of
sun8i_r40_tcon_tv_set_mux(). However, the patch modifies the wrong function
and introduces a build failure.

Fixes: 0305189afb32 ("drm/sun4i: tcon: Add support for R40 TCON")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

> drm/sun4i: Fix pdev reference leak in sun8i_r40_tcon_tv_set_mux()
> 
> of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the TCON TOP device
> which the error paths release, but the success path returns without
> doing so.  Drop the reference before returning success.

The commit message states it fixes a leak in sun8i_r40_tcon_tv_set_mux(),
but the patch actually modifies sun4i_tcon_init_clocks().

Looking at sun8i_r40_tcon_tv_set_mux() in the baseline, the success path
appears to fall through to the out_put_device label, which already correctly
drops the reference:

out_put_device:
        put_device(&pdev->dev);

        return ret;

Could the commit message be referencing an issue that does not exist in
this tree, or was the patch misapplied?

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> index bf405a2aa3249..b5a85738876ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> @@ -808,6 +808,8 @@ static int sun4i_tcon_init_clocks(struct device *dev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	put_device(&pdev->dev);

[Severity: Low]
Does this code compile? The variable pdev is undeclared in the scope of
sun4i_tcon_init_clocks(), which causes a build failure.

> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916182412.2091681-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16 18:24 [PATCH] drm/sun4i: Fix pdev reference leak in sun8i_r40_tcon_tv_set_mux() Wentao Liang
2026-09-16 18:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17 13:57 ` kernel test robot
2026-09-17 20:29 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260916183028.17C6D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox