From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f47.google.com (mail-ej1-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0782917C8; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f47.google.com with SMTP id p15so28529016ejc.7; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 11:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vbMPbp7aUefqeHa6gEgmXUlWTRHZ3oMWVTDKwmVUOh8=; b=KJEMIj4e7Nkf5NRQSkeGOdWSQ/71GPeTAtj19TfSQfaw192KiobZULMM0yawIDtQ+1 kRjZ1hHKMIFz5w9uzoszb/2UfxMFLVuhv1pcx3l2FbrdwFg0o9IdUwBssH6gMmasF+sC tAYmb4Zc+PawW5CU655i1OQPBPDNcC4ClfHWIMZ2+DO3B8slsGym7/pz3iqIyZLr1GZ5 MLbeRvJiT+5mT7bKd/c/7BGNhUV9FRT6Rbo4IITF2Ehl994/2iaeC7VBC13O0Owz00Gp EuxD4peu6TSeWZYYpDmgXNCmVOuyQzE+ikHq9qi/Eo1WQKNiWby277cISSVlNRAYEi5t uS3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vbMPbp7aUefqeHa6gEgmXUlWTRHZ3oMWVTDKwmVUOh8=; b=01IzxdHjrPoYHaeocVdBTtHoQBgGKwTPbbtPyyZ2m3ukjG2G4jsRe3JDpGxk+8UHXV LqmOA9ClUdN7vqG4dkPgfWoF2fpufDPU1CngdQGzvhQUznf+Ud3ITZBD0npbAf9L8E25 bYGDPpb6eQ0JorOYCtP2M/gbNkd6okrqvKcmH2EkAPsm3uZeUxAt5Oo5YYvWVB3raeCB q/3WB9ouFjQUQyCsPK675cM/H34NSCQyTpBNQlZ/KUrq8T4S6HEfeuF3v4bMJA+hGl5t cDXBLRtAXjAL24MU1Vsh6DakUMkbyJFJVKBbspBtrVtRN983/5RhPw5AKwIqSpoS1gD3 sR8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UP4l5eKL8GElN8QdXKyla8a20LrcyXrMWc7PPNcv/F0Ku+q4L QwyAzWhSJ9nNfKFC7zWWoeU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyOku7BguihhRDVr/2uQVz3QRhlNTGjiETo2Ny1XHm1wtZufdXrCu7Vy7i491eGogKd7Bkqg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6e14:b0:6e7:f589:b7b4 with SMTP id sd20-20020a1709076e1400b006e7f589b7b4mr4991013ejc.222.1649184040612; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 11:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jernej-laptop.localnet (cpe-86-58-32-107.static.triera.net. [86.58.32.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dm11-20020a170907948b00b006cf488e72e3sm5795532ejc.25.2022.04.05.11.40.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Apr 2022 11:40:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Jernej =?utf-8?B?xaBrcmFiZWM=?= To: ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, Benjamin Gaignard Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, nicolas@ndufresne.ca, hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, wens@csie.org, samuel@sholland.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] media: hantro: Add 10-bit support Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 20:40:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4386971.LvFx2qVVIh@jernej-laptop> In-Reply-To: References: <20220227144926.3006585-1-jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi Benjamin! Dne torek, 05. april 2022 ob 18:07:41 CEST je Benjamin Gaignard napisal(a): > Le 27/02/2022 =E0 15:49, Jernej Skrabec a =E9crit : > > First two patches add 10-bit formats to UAPI, third extends filtering > > mechanism, fourth fixes incorrect assumption, fifth moves register > > configuration code to proper place, sixth and seventh enable 10-bit > > VP9 decoding on Allwinner H6 and last increases core frequency on > > Allwinner H6. > >=20 > > I'm sending this as RFC to get some comments: > > 1. format definitions - are fourcc's ok? are comments/descriptions ok? > > 2. is extended filtering mechanism ok? > >=20 > > I would also like if these patches are tested on some more HW. > > Additionally, can someone test tiled P010? > >=20 > > Please take a look. >=20 > Hi Jernej, >=20 > I have create a branch to test this series with VP9 and HEVC: > https://gitlab.collabora.com/benjamin.gaignard/for-upstream/-/tree/10bit_= imx > 8m Feel free to pick what I may need in it. >=20 > That doesn't improve fluster scores, I think more dev are still needed in > GST before getting something fully functional. > Anyway I able to select P010 pixel format if the input is a 10bit bitstre= am. What kind of improvements do you expect? Actually, this series is designed = to=20 change nothing for platforms, where 10-bit format is not added into the lis= t=20 of supported formats. I think reasons are quite obvious. First, not every=20 device may support 10-bit output. Second, as you might already figured it o= ut,=20 registers in this series are set only for legacy cores. I have no idea, wha= t=20 needs to be done for newer ones, since I don't have them. Anyway, I tested= =20 this with fluster and only one additional test passes, because it is the on= ly=20 one for 10-bit YUV420. Best regards, Jernej