From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f49.google.com (mail-ej1-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60BCC4C7D for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 19:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 13so21133355ejn.3 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Nq/APDJ1/i7tYioV5hUAkwvhILl5RMdNbxu0oP9Zowo=; b=S//juSlij40GbQm+UzMkx9pe4GilcX0yFl9N8MOVXy0tTuq4qH2Q1AG+0Ie8iKWUxS VBJWP+7nUAyZRKG6bNBFd9rgF5V90RsuevlhyKBBYUcxmeG/3rT9Y7H/O64Y+hgxyH4u n0Gfcet4L1YqOnm0Ie4M/tJ1K6AnrRR6rsAG6b2iMBAGeaTlXaWaOjRFaMproAB0Rfkd yGHFsshpwiinpJ4o7KUgcbNG5CFqJ5BLf0YlGlSHIBpMrzQn5wf9a9wKO2r1ja7bsx9V lnUb+VLJBFx+3IspDy467Ow5BA9AleexHDEPQYO3ODQFZ9XZmz9OZ89zqweESyIfBWOh K44A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Nq/APDJ1/i7tYioV5hUAkwvhILl5RMdNbxu0oP9Zowo=; b=GqERJDYqinLQyVK8kfCgjUJg1hsAmSk9lV/S0Bh8mktVRPLFmDXoMaaYxMKpIB5iOT rLeLBjL6AT3lYaK5+lFcUjqUpC9x0STPkWOD727F8GufiS71LYfY4YCtX2I90BkegOOR WFk2LPNLI9ogvDSB3xnv++2lQoXSYM+0g1xsH44zoKofaR+MK52QQGTPRB4DKkUlwIZE GkLj/JYSyozU8S3dSV06dPzjCzEyVTF5MfzCunB3tECOTfwlAGk7fpwri7g3rhowrj2w DIlH5tTmKUlx+YA8CozGqgpRzubhmRP1SNsn8Rn2q7wEbEVlBkk6NfnEn9lOJfIBEoEA eYRg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3lk4AUmyHSr9fWhqTR22/Xp/DttcKKU68S91y1gyjvhNKJfh2w zTtb/bbuyVUHldZRwYqePOM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7CA8//3SyAUldovN5OAm+KAnq+khm0KTenfTZP8RCbkkZJqClOrzFwOhDtIRpW7gkIliGmfg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:5c2:b0:77e:def7:65d8 with SMTP id wg2-20020a17090705c200b0077edef765d8mr41276589ejb.487.1667677608563; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 12:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jernej-laptop.localnet (89-212-118-115.static.t-2.net. [89.212.118.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i24-20020a05640200d800b00463c367024bsm1557754edu.63.2022.11.05.12.46.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 05 Nov 2022 12:46:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Jernej =?utf-8?B?xaBrcmFiZWM=?= To: Chen-Yu Tsai , Samuel Holland Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Samuel Holland Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bus: sunxi-rsb: Support atomic transfers Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2022 20:46:47 +0100 Message-ID: <4779430.31r3eYUQgx@jernej-laptop> In-Reply-To: <20221105191954.14360-3-samuel@sholland.org> References: <20221105191954.14360-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20221105191954.14360-3-samuel@sholland.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Dne sobota, 05. november 2022 ob 20:19:53 CET je Samuel Holland napisal(a): > When communicating with a PMIC during system poweroff (pm_power_off()), > IRQs are disabled and we are in a RCU read-side critical section, so we > cannot use wait_for_completion_io_timeout(). Instead, poll the status > register for transfer completion. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland > --- > > drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > index 17343cd75338..0f0e498d4379 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > @@ -267,6 +267,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunxi_rsb_driver_register); > /* common code that starts a transfer */ > static int _sunxi_rsb_run_xfer(struct sunxi_rsb *rsb) > { > + bool timeout; > + u32 status; > + > if (readl(rsb->regs + RSB_CTRL) & RSB_CTRL_START_TRANS) { > dev_dbg(rsb->dev, "RSB transfer still in progress\n"); > return -EBUSY; > @@ -279,8 +282,16 @@ static int _sunxi_rsb_run_xfer(struct sunxi_rsb *rsb) > writel(RSB_CTRL_START_TRANS | RSB_CTRL_GLOBAL_INT_ENB, > rsb->regs + RSB_CTRL); > > - if (!wait_for_completion_io_timeout(&rsb->complete, > - msecs_to_jiffies(100))) { > + if (irqs_disabled()) { > + timeout = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(rsb->regs + RSB_INTS, > + status, status, 10, 100000); It would be good to check only for RSB_INTS_LOAD_BSY, RSB_INTS_TRANS_ERR and RSB_INTS_TRANS_OVER flags and clear them afterwards. That way we avoid problems if this path is used outside power off case. Best regards, Jernej > + } else { > + timeout = !wait_for_completion_io_timeout(&rsb- >complete, > + msecs_to_jiffies(100)); > + status = rsb->status; > + } > + > + if (timeout) { > dev_dbg(rsb->dev, "RSB timeout\n"); > > /* abort the transfer */ > @@ -292,18 +303,18 @@ static int _sunxi_rsb_run_xfer(struct sunxi_rsb *rsb) > return -ETIMEDOUT; > } > > - if (rsb->status & RSB_INTS_LOAD_BSY) { > + if (status & RSB_INTS_LOAD_BSY) { > dev_dbg(rsb->dev, "RSB busy\n"); > return -EBUSY; > } > > - if (rsb->status & RSB_INTS_TRANS_ERR) { > - if (rsb->status & RSB_INTS_TRANS_ERR_ACK) { > + if (status & RSB_INTS_TRANS_ERR) { > + if (status & RSB_INTS_TRANS_ERR_ACK) { > dev_dbg(rsb->dev, "RSB slave nack\n"); > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (rsb->status & RSB_INTS_TRANS_ERR_DATA) { > + if (status & RSB_INTS_TRANS_ERR_DATA) { > dev_dbg(rsb->dev, "RSB transfer data error\n"); > return -EIO; > }