From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C0494404 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id v2so19065897lfi.6 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:46:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc; bh=gQ9ZdHAonv1+cNCneY42f+VkcN8uTabWejW5IY05OD4=; b=KTjTHibusJ3Q5B6hEEPhteJ85Ffv8KvOEn3uUw/xQVRdL6Zo1CkYrEOL7ZAC1Tw1Ou uU5RufF2Tdvu2+nmf2C0KTfR7A2Igxvxw8T/eUeKx52INZGiEKRka7WEIwxCR2CZ+ZSJ e/vQmpHliCd7Cqy1Zy50sfUCIIZLixaPjkqOK/7InUSjMIC23bUaIt6Mck1XWtEetmMJ xqdxUZuSJKJ3/glf0Mj/ekPD8QxDCZ/UHom2kzqDSWgHHwSlRbzFsqaKV29BqFV401mW L7PQ51pKmSprJ5+3vGlxrNT1VYAzmVYMxSR7p0A1IxGR+jY3AsB4EmseuYJKfMqe6EzN W1KA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=gQ9ZdHAonv1+cNCneY42f+VkcN8uTabWejW5IY05OD4=; b=ex5ftPsf/1kFDBBFPX7shuFdQfsC5XtvmgdnZVnDcnoMnmPZolQWx+dGbQc2H/cW5i 9seEYskK4laPspQ0RRx9Y87d6aBb1R57eNCoXRM/79ZrYfcekpA5jHHjeqb0v3aAW26+ 13WRdDtQsckT70s2Pkiau1Kiq8jl2uc75zIFF6N2OOpFZKtCC8jv1GYjDePxqktOmyw2 uYO9UVrB4TgSu68tT7jQk+PFvcZO2L4TZ6D8QS1nZeBwYe9alo+LF4TT3ilPP0Sp3u7o jOezfUJZJHysmhmrujpLwzEM44rhKpWdSnh8//TnD0nDioSkiCX4GWkcvCRCSkzN4dpe AF8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3mp+jRfy1+dgmwle4/Gi2Mruo0XQJQ8g29jSZHlegTlLvyr+sM qohx+q8onJzSpkrppMC+xELqCg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4vOLQVaDpNaTlrgQpr6MQJs6T1zj+svIXXP/Rtynk4ey8sYo2c1ptChOUd++TTtrnFyrV1cw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:6b0b:0:b0:48a:e7de:d34c with SMTP id d11-20020a196b0b000000b0048ae7ded34cmr8780224lfa.454.1660743973563; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:14bb:ae:539c:1b1c:14b7:109b:ed76? (d15l54h48cw7vbh-qr4-4.rev.dnainternet.fi. [2001:14bb:ae:539c:1b1c:14b7:109b:ed76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10-20020a05651c032a00b0025d5eb5dde7sm2151655ljp.104.2022.08.17.06.46.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64913eef-8b4f-7617-578b-53ddc22bd06e@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:46:11 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] regulator: dt-bindings: Add Allwinner D1 LDOs Content-Language: en-US To: Samuel Holland , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Maxime Ripard , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev References: <20220815043436.20170-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20220815043436.20170-2-samuel@sholland.org> <03de0f7b-9251-a5c0-91a1-5f2b5d41d8a0@sholland.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <03de0f7b-9251-a5c0-91a1-5f2b5d41d8a0@sholland.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 17/08/2022 11:15, Samuel Holland wrote: >>> + audio-codec@2030000 { >>> + compatible = "simple-mfd", "syscon"; >> >> This cannot be on its own. Both require device specific compatible. > > Again, the device-specific compatible does not exist, because the binding for > the audio codec has not been written (and it will be quite nontrivial). > > So I can: > 1) Leave the example as-is until the audio codec binding gets written, > and fill in the specific compatible at that time. > 2) Remove the example, with the reasoning that the example really > belongs with the MFD parent (like for the other regulator). Then > there will be no example until the audio codec binding is written. > 3) Drop the analog LDOs from this series entirely, and some parts > of the SoC (like thermal monitoring) cannot be added to the DTSI > until the audio codec binding is written. > > What do you think? > > The same question applies for the D1 SoC DTSI, where I use this same construct. > > (And technically this does validate with the current schema.) BTW, it validates only because of limitation in DT schema. Such combination is not allowed and I wonder if we can make the schema stricter... Best regards, Krzysztof