From: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Brandon Cheo Fusi <fusibrandon13@gmail.com>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka1@gmail.com>,
Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@gmail.com>,
Ryan Walklin <ryan@testtoast.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] cpufreq: sun50i: Add H616 support
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:46:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65e86555-761e-4e26-8778-e2452876b5e4@sholland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240326114743.712167-7-andre.przywara@arm.com>
Hi Andre,
On 3/26/24 06:47, Andre Przywara wrote:
> From: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
>
> The Allwinner H616/H618 SoCs have different OPP tables per SoC version
> and die revision. The SoC version is stored in NVMEM, as before, though
> encoded differently. The die revision is in a different register, in the
> SRAM controller. Firmware already exports that value in a standardised
> way, through the SMCCC SoCID mechanism. We need both values, as some chips
> have the same SoC version, but they don't support the same frequencies and
> they get differentiated by the die revision.
>
> Add the new compatible string and tie the new translation function to
> it. This mechanism not only covers the original H616 SoC, but also its
> very close sibling SoCs H618 and H700, so add them to the list as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/sun50i-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sun50i-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sun50i-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> index bd170611c7906..f9e9fc340f848 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sun50i-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sun50i-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
> @@ -46,14 +47,71 @@ static u32 sun50i_h6_efuse_xlate(u32 speedbin)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Judging by the OPP tables in the vendor BSP, the quality order of the
> + * returned speedbin index is 4 -> 0/2 -> 3 -> 1, from worst to best.
> + * 0 and 2 seem identical from the OPP tables' point of view.
> + */
> +static u32 sun50i_h616_efuse_xlate(u32 speedbin)
> +{
> + int ver_bits = arm_smccc_get_soc_id_revision();
This needs a Kconfig dependency on ARM_SMCCC_SOC_ID.
Regards,
Samuel
> + u32 value = 0;
> +
> + switch (speedbin & 0xffff) {
> + case 0x2000:
> + value = 0;
> + break;
> + case 0x2400:
> + case 0x7400:
> + case 0x2c00:
> + case 0x7c00:
> + if (ver_bits != SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED && ver_bits <= 1) {
> + /* ic version A/B */
> + value = 1;
> + } else {
> + /* ic version C and later version */
> + value = 2;
> + }
> + break;
> + case 0x5000:
> + case 0x5400:
> + case 0x6000:
> + value = 3;
> + break;
> + case 0x5c00:
> + value = 4;
> + break;
> + case 0x5d00:
> + value = 0;
> + break;
> + case 0x6c00:
> + value = 5;
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_warn("sun50i-cpufreq-nvmem: unknown speed bin 0x%x, using default bin 0\n",
> + speedbin & 0xffff);
> + value = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return value;
> +}
> +
> static struct sunxi_cpufreq_data sun50i_h6_cpufreq_data = {
> .efuse_xlate = sun50i_h6_efuse_xlate,
> };
>
> +static struct sunxi_cpufreq_data sun50i_h616_cpufreq_data = {
> + .efuse_xlate = sun50i_h616_efuse_xlate,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id cpu_opp_match_list[] = {
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points",
> .data = &sun50i_h6_cpufreq_data,
> },
> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616-operating-points",
> + .data = &sun50i_h616_cpufreq_data,
> + },
> {}
> };
>
> @@ -230,6 +288,9 @@ static struct platform_driver sun50i_cpufreq_driver = {
>
> static const struct of_device_id sun50i_cpufreq_match_list[] = {
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6" },
> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616" },
> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h618" },
> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h700" },
> {}
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun50i_cpufreq_match_list);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-26 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/8] cpufreq: sun50i: Add Allwinner H616 support Andre Przywara
2024-03-26 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] firmware: smccc: Export revision soc_id function Andre Przywara
2024-03-26 13:18 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-26 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Blocklist Allwinner H616/618 SoCs Andre Przywara
2024-03-27 20:57 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-03-26 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] dt-bindings: opp: Describe H616 OPPs and opp-supported-hw Andre Przywara
2024-03-26 21:37 ` Rob Herring
2024-03-26 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] cpufreq: sun50i: Refactor speed bin decoding Andre Przywara
2024-03-27 21:19 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-03-26 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] cpufreq: sun50i: Add support for opp_supported_hw Andre Przywara
2024-03-27 21:20 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-03-26 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] cpufreq: sun50i: Add H616 support Andre Przywara
2024-03-27 3:46 ` Samuel Holland [this message]
2024-03-27 11:46 ` Andre Przywara
2024-03-27 11:58 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-27 12:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-03-27 12:16 ` Andre Przywara
2024-03-26 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] arm64: dts: allwinner: h616: Add CPU OPPs table Andre Przywara
2024-03-27 21:24 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-03-26 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] arm64: dts: allwinner: h616: enable DVFS for all boards Andre Przywara
2024-03-27 21:25 ` Jernej Škrabec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65e86555-761e-4e26-8778-e2452876b5e4@sholland.org \
--to=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fusibrandon13@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=macroalpha82@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.botka1@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.botka@somainline.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan@testtoast.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tiny.windzz@gmail.com \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox