From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D6C3D7D6B for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 15:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773070071; cv=none; b=JB9l6wxf9Z25fGTkDQF2vz+W6bCZDCcJMea08CWtbPClU+mKz4n/QWLpkQsG8eIfPIlPy8xoyqRr05k7ZJxlFtzqGSo0Bcg9vl+56E3kv+p2rhu2sHpIudhaI2Tc2phFkE18t+b11n2kmjR6ECr9dS2t7OP7jcDIhCMp8xn1m3M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773070071; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7o2lSlwnqD1IVDD/21T16zX/mpFvqv7Ltx6kYFACD5k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q4o0PRAgBD41a0N2AXzsCHseLfl3whBGU851xQtOuF4Pr8gkCqGdkQuOLD08QatUCrx47HadgUvNT5ZGxgEghdjSndQhVAc+XcL0BhnDrCLUDIwihGKRD8Fjeh70zcMMXlllNzbwXGuS/NyhWUQz50Mfy/Ad0u7oziEPwzfhZmE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=NcIIly4D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="NcIIly4D" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8663FC4287A; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 15:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21DD15FFB8; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 15:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id A34C810369A9B; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 16:27:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1773070067; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=7o2lSlwnqD1IVDD/21T16zX/mpFvqv7Ltx6kYFACD5k=; b=NcIIly4DbRfRXqvItRLuep3qvqLnq7SWhqJtYzXeNVq2UihIuui7iJgcIR9rZ7xWW5Htgk DrnDaxi8xhMGISqAKGpd0ZYMozw4VtIKNzmAMN8P7zyyJ5RbuoEAwpobhkkGBsiXOuQ2WE x0v/927EmHkOjGGwcFUC+Hfw5D3mV0ZgxuOAd+MzRN/YWnV3OBq8QwsuB692Tvyg1CcEnf VYQSx1JfLeeHLZ0mwzfH2Adf+oROoXoyOhZrGgJAKAm92N8GElRtRDmfq7HGxmfo0tLBog izRJVSb3XnR45xZUIzhSonml8BF0sWdzQWNrrZaC7jlCX8HQ6LKGS6vEhLxVYA== From: Miquel Raynal To: Richard Genoud Cc: Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Wentao Liang , Maxime Ripard , Boris Brezillon , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: do not count BBM bytes twice In-Reply-To: <20260305100137.2558423-4-richard.genoud@bootlin.com> (Richard Genoud's message of "Thu, 5 Mar 2026 11:01:34 +0100") References: <20260305100137.2558423-1-richard.genoud@bootlin.com> <20260305100137.2558423-4-richard.genoud@bootlin.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.2 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 16:27:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87a4whnhu9.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello Richard, On 05/03/2026 at 11:01:34 +01, Richard Genoud = wrote: > BBM is part of USER_DATA section, so we should remove it twice Maybe you mean "is already part" and as such the end of the sentence should be that "we should *not* remove it twice"? > This was working ok because we are on the safe size, advertising that > there was 2 bytes less available than in reality. > > But we can't change old platforms, since it may lead to a different ECC > strength, so, introduce a legacy flag for old platforms, and switch the > new platforms to the correct count. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l