From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com (mail-io1-f48.google.com [209.85.166.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D8B72 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 21:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id x10so3351282iop.13 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:42:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qd944/33EGNvarYt9LguiByGSn6PliDxz6H/Wc7YWo8=; b=s5tsOiNbqO1jee5Tnud1kGIiH6yOb39QyFKF3R81aRkk6GannUE6ctv3XZg6yQ+KY8 Q9sZHZOaUbZ5SbcDr5I3IEsAup8ZQZbraZax80uJueBSk/r7USdyDLOuu7Fpmti5MhMs IhBsUwaQ1zIGyfVPqEqcyZKrRNSDP6Ks3n916LFO3BNURu/LRdpklpmX5/fLF9AMzFrv jPec39aYGcJrwrvOsd2CtmPGAYXALW+hkMk5ZnI/EqsKro6HwS/feZ55bH/FF6i/kuRv OU5oeZ6EGjtasLfd+MN9qMgRsoXxbGCBcJ4LwM7auwI195DTeETVUOmxK7HhtDYknZpZ LC9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZnG6ks4iA3hbJM0eh99kmlWoilBAGgW8NH7Ept4tFXUshL31u ZTQmNplyyrDm3IdrpL+N+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+ZOeoBtNGfcez4vKR0YkxjL0B2Oc4THdp++CjixnxsCCq3YPDlYVhyfTSfhujhXR42ytigA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:208:: with SMTP id e8mr11670283jaq.66.1628286168793; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org ([64.188.179.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d16sm1087635ilc.39.2021.08.06.14.42.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 1854740 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 21:42:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 15:42:46 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Icenowy Zheng Cc: Ulf Hansson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Alexandre Belloni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jernej Skrabec , Andre Przywara , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , Rob Herring , Samuel Holland , Chen-Yu Tsai Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/17] dt-bindings: mmc: sunxi-mmc: add R329 MMC compatible string Message-ID: References: <20210802062212.73220-1-icenowy@sipeed.com> <20210802062212.73220-13-icenowy@sipeed.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210802062212.73220-13-icenowy@sipeed.com> On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:22:07 +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > R329 SoC has two MMC controllers similar to ones in the previous > Allwinner SoCs. However, as R329 has no eMMC controller, the two MMC > controllers look like a mixture of previous SoCs' ordinary MMC > controller and eMMC controller. > > Add a compatible string for R329 MMC controllers. > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/allwinner,sun4i-a10-mmc.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > Acked-by: Rob Herring