From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (www.zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F78ED4 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 16:31:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=sang-engineering.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=AcBPC6b8Ow54uIrFRglU9gzXaSUC Q4cd7DaZDtjcLyQ=; b=Tep0sd+ZQs/pV7W17OP62Su2NA/HIveSPhneZhKmB3yr EFlsmnQ5J+3HzyhQ8LEt7EK1iocP9C2nrggkVq47g0R2v2ipR57zJ83uApFUonar qZ9hKdd71rBIwi6WhnPuU9lacp/q/XseyT093J/wJcxudPOdGVdA1ORY6mfVvpY= Received: (qmail 801843 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2022 18:25:03 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 1 Apr 2022 18:25:03 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@tUKLOJrbdqYgAQnoAGGbAFirbAEmXd1u Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 18:25:03 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@infineon.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] mmc: improve API to make clear {h|s}w_reset is for cards Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@infineon.com References: <20220321115059.21803-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PxhwHXhOFLOXfgmr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220321115059.21803-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --PxhwHXhOFLOXfgmr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > I tested it with my Renesas boards, so far no regressions. Buildbots are Wishful thinking, the patches crash now when booting. Still checking what is the difference to when I send the patches out. Still, looking forward to comments on the general approach. --PxhwHXhOFLOXfgmr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmJHJ1oACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYPGw//YUU0c/TCXVii8TbBtVaxFJ+SFYjCQiY3RhhVPIrWlCF7+1v7BKyWdqz+ I/ctuhs3uUutw1dE3/WI12HevWANnVdw6EI8D0+aJOrxaCfMueJpEugMYguwpk8t ZWB8Kh+8Lozg55uOn7i4byGA5UThrrbV9k6/IwKnfbGS+fKUVWL9uJxMKssYx0uM ZjgVIKF0bSg0As+UuQBiFhKqJQybnBa27DHtl1n8Co3zX79M5T//aB/SvLbeyyKM MhsVF3xd7LxdWDVTkXEdjQqVtApNlGAp9+2iYdb86V0dd+hz0PWO9Acp9VB2ZOEv OcIhc8r0iExSdFITQeSevS5LdnRhyxv8mA0K4pS2ndbIPwut0dmHSSU4PnseFcAy khFA8jDujq1jz83z0ucAlCsr3U/u0Yrb7CGyLA3zKTCP05RLvPsbAxyymT2EOfen S9+LsJhEXiQ2KstNsFqWch/PebTxMkyrVvCo+US+HhCsDTP01WvqxwtC0TkB69Zk cjVeDWo5QkggA1nYKPntr9OIyqeHCmowWHW+2V4zmWAgI1qodhPfQnFsUuzwbbXy j8cavhOoe3ZKwLeH5X1gP0mOClgbRWFEzOBEFq2W94rLvt8gMp85Md8l2Y1MMUO2 5byHakN0xAIFBbcv+tGO6SAK9ld3vFtWIoPtyYHnDKjmKQwU1GE= =v18S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PxhwHXhOFLOXfgmr--