public inbox for linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev" <linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev>,
	Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] iommu: Remove useless group refcounting
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:01:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLpzqVAxxLGJp+L4@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5276130E7AE8B0BEA43FCC6C8C3FA@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 07:10:57AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 3:06 AM
> >
> >  int iommu_device_use_default_domain(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -	struct iommu_group *group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> > +	/* Caller must be a probed driver on dev */
> > +	struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;
> >  	int ret = 0;
> 
> this is called in the probing path by .dma_configure().
> 
> the driver hasn't been probed yet hence the rationale to not
> refcount is due to device_lock() instead?

At this point the driver core has partially attached/detached a driver
so I'm considering it part of the probed driver explanation.

Really during anything protected by the driver core probe path is
assured that the group cannot change.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-21 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 19:05 [PATCH 00/10] Refine the locking for dev->iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 01/10] iommu: Remove useless group refcounting Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-20  6:11   ` Baolu Lu
2023-07-21  7:10   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-21 12:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-07-24  2:11       ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-24 18:06         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-25  2:12           ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 02/10] iommu: Add a lockdep assertion for remaining dev->iommu_group reads Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-20  6:33   ` Baolu Lu
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 03/10] iommu: Add generic_single_device_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-20  7:39   ` Baolu Lu
2023-07-20 12:04     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-20 14:01       ` Baolu Lu
2023-07-21 17:19         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-22 14:01           ` Baolu Lu
2023-07-21  7:17   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-24 13:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-22 14:02   ` Baolu Lu
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 04/10] iommu/sun50i: Convert to generic_single_device_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 05/10] iommu/sprd: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 06/10] iommu/rockchip: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 07/10] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-21  7:20   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-21 12:04     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 08/10] iommu/omap: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 09/10] iommu: Complete the locking for dev->iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-20  9:55   ` Baolu Lu
2023-07-18 19:05 ` [PATCH 10/10] iommu/intel: Fix missing locking for show_device_domain_translation() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-20  9:56   ` Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZLpzqVAxxLGJp+L4@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox