From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com (mail-pf1-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E155148FF8 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712941946; cv=none; b=BTJf/mmdCe4KLpjyBMMNz1JvunpFVwBL8OTfVyX6n1EH5TBxL85JCMvFBxq0qFCFppxtAlZaxQ/B01qNNMVwUzG2UtUf+japQzoYn9TjAo94L1+odibTOMzKlWEB728/BuUxUQm//ytRs9GLZ9YyCShHBuD2kf4XGAuOET8vAb0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712941946; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zqFAuUa4RtTLPiQXk/lFHSFz6oHcmMCx6C1nVyRW8AM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VlbTEsGjkXPcNX44Q5PX4rru4N+tei5tJI8TBg2emWZKZ/1NObsfxWX6GlyhofCOUZZ7TJIOB89SxwmlJGQwaD5iVPd3JlzsN6VImCkfjMMoLNoU4M8wIJRv3zNQn3QigbFln0UQKzsu+RiAsIg65GGaH2TdMUUBmGLHYeMC4TY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=24Ba/pgb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="24Ba/pgb" Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6ed04c91c46so1146357b3a.0 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:12:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1712941943; x=1713546743; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V6RQsJgA0sqhyVb4iUdwKlWBxVZP7PvFbdqSmnVezOg=; b=24Ba/pgbuGOjk/I9uCIBnYa6/gG4/h/xMPTlNxRNAe+nd0TeNyDyr6ebv8jKaBQcp/ 4x4KLbedciW9SSfP2JhRpt1ZrxPiLYDhtSlL9diTxVcsmz0UUbsvorve38gHP9PQ4Un4 fP9Tkmi/p6lK1qORmhEqmj6tYVnHIrH3M4yfXrWlYXCHXyRzxdzlYeMDyqPSoZbogLkz AeUJjsyTBaGI0mn3yqH3iZRfkpo8Ve9u3tZPd29kcXWRm/HB2D6eNnm4TzmVXB/dqn8E o0oCFc2g+8uRBn+dMhhJNV1Z+pBUMS73IsYOaIxmzH2FuV2vVAsf/wrSqk0eqR3JROWz esuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712941943; x=1713546743; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=V6RQsJgA0sqhyVb4iUdwKlWBxVZP7PvFbdqSmnVezOg=; b=Aqi4f8X50fQSscFMMj9EsD+Ljwhd9RqQw8WkqNTwsgxu1h+izA56loZWVF4XoGJqZC y19tgJbhXRNBedvwXlYbD07eeDyvDY2Ep8f5VK3iv4se9y5cFFcYCPm9lsngOSLzVTbL abTHU8jf/wxfrb6FposfOkVR2NYfQ0aXN/jVAhExABi9lHAx7bfPwqIwboYcKhOh6+th wNk/TB8/YLCsCeCpMmXGkaT0KtfBh/520zbJXzTz/Rob2yUaTwAGYdb10U8OglxAT9qo a5UfXdqDRWIm7cA06IMG9YojN9SUYOqyKqKojoCs5qXhOvTtFbjZPu0zAtJYv0R7S+dy gFyA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU/LTHYdMeGwPHk4KxPWr5fU8Ob5nPwlxtYsTthDyslmPiZVHJR7/Bh07D50P1VPhWPQlJU+06w+klG1YKvHExOAVGjgvG0L5+f7qc= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzMI72/nwT1tXjAIbLhWDpMLBgJyZb4NwRIsOlCeoFniCd3i+dd vP9a6kqSkjM7ALgf3GgDHNHMUb72K8LJigC/S26RVMyjrUKQ9QpDTnTzJEh+NYw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGENLLg9Nrtb+afnnQbyAqzrlHIs52avdhanWUzgTqUmFBmisUUxHkztjDQR67LUvfCdWQBaQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:550a:b0:1a9:4343:765f with SMTP id ko10-20020a056a20550a00b001a94343765fmr3511412pzb.23.1712941942911; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ghost ([2601:647:5700:6860:121b:da6b:94f1:304]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4-20020aa78484000000b006ed59179b14sm3114754pfn.83.2024.04.12.10.12.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:12:20 -0700 From: Charlie Jenkins To: Conor Dooley Cc: Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Guo Ren , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Evan Green , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment_L=E9ger?= , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] riscv: cpufeature: Fix thead vector hwcap removal Message-ID: References: <20240411-dev-charlie-support_thead_vector_6_9-v1-0-4af9815ec746@rivosinc.com> <20240411-dev-charlie-support_thead_vector_6_9-v1-2-4af9815ec746@rivosinc.com> <20240412-tuesday-resident-d9d07e75463c@wendy> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240412-tuesday-resident-d9d07e75463c@wendy> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:25:47AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:11:08PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > The riscv_cpuinfo struct that contains mvendorid and marchid is not > > populated until all harts are booted which happens after the DT parsing. > > Use the vendorid/archid values from the DT if available or assume all > > harts have the same values as the boot hart as a fallback. > > > > Fixes: d82f32202e0d ("RISC-V: Ignore V from the riscv,isa DT property on older T-Head CPUs") > > If this is our only use case for getting the mvendorid/marchid stuff > from dt, then I don't think we should add it. None of the devicetrees > that the commit you're fixing here addresses will have these properties > and if they did have them, they'd then also be new enough to hopefully > not have "v" either - the issue is they're using whatever crap the > vendor shipped. Yes, the DT those shipped with will not have the property in the DT so will fall back on the boot hart. The addition of the DT properties allow future heterogenous systems to be able to function. > If we're gonna get the information from DT, we already have something > that we can look at to perform the disable as the cpu compatibles give > us enough information to make the decision. > > I also think that we could just cache the boot CPU's marchid/mvendorid, > since we already have to look at it in riscv_fill_cpu_mfr_info(), avoid > repeating these ecalls on all systems. Yeah that is a minor optimization that can I can apply. > > Perhaps for now we could just look at the boot CPU alone? To my > knowledge the systems that this targets all have homogeneous > marchid/mvendorid values of 0x0. They have an mvendorid of 0x5b7. This is already falling back on the boot CPU, but that is not a solution that scales. Even though all systems currently have homogenous marchid/mvendorid I am hesitant to assert that all systems are homogenous without providing an option to override this. The overhead is looking for a field in the DT which does not seem to be impactful enough to prevent the addition of this option. > > > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins > > > @@ -514,12 +521,23 @@ static void __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(unsigned long *isa2hwcap) > > pr_warn("Unable to find \"riscv,isa\" devicetree entry\n"); > > continue; > > } > > + if (of_property_read_u64(node, "riscv,vendorid", &this_vendorid) < 0) { > > + pr_warn("Unable to find \"riscv,vendorid\" devicetree entry, using boot hart mvendorid instead\n"); > > This should 100% not be a warning, it's not a required property in the > binding. Yes definitely, thank you. - Charlie > > Cheers, > Conor. > > > + this_vendorid = boot_vendorid; > > + } >