From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCE71EF36E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768305032; cv=none; b=GHTBoCNNSrSnmyMbscDQhxWnurvbbqlgu9dEikNIE2nOBqNo3j55iVQYc/65bYN81W3phXkyQVY498hjtBnPYBGY9J/PCbMfA20ofbTcgKz6j2swwX1rG5coR+zsekvv9SYWdkULMrkRhbQbThVSLvmeYAysUPqXWORqwTQnVmY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768305032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n4OVLfYY0h+IhJRy0NAJNM9iTR92XV2VZ5uyTVzCW10=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lkx1nPl7TLY8HLPxXvj0Gq5HrUQ63LdX0oXmjsWkkfVgPTrnlArTxWDNetkVNfipPSG9emhtcJRKC915rls3ecaYJnk0xvZVr8zEDSN9N1V+vpeSOEIEgSGbxufAadnc9ig/PjL3f3pPKI4T0oHi2oeGyJMIVvaaZDxB1iKgGvI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=IK6cGx34; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="IK6cGx34" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=n4OV LfYY0h+IhJRy0NAJNM9iTR92XV2VZ5uyTVzCW10=; b=IK6cGx348zX7nPG426bj 8pPnKRpaSVk7EenccYs2FR7/yoEeCbW95pRoGqMTBs3I4Rx4GXVA2VKIqoiZm3lP i4KGG6AZ8yTUBSwhhme6M4Tb+jyrWuCOfdoAb2OK1uVl/DGQvEeeN4sTV6b6oUxh JX3+mzlFDfkdfFVHJDTMKv+5v4hiUFNPlM86mcoJc3DCYD6p/P2G0FwdXGDxAyCT X74tcUuRdXObFtGQ6Su9RVR+dLqe+0lCYNQxILagDFy/f6uijcSKThYtmM+ZT+uh NWW/idAeMF6/hdDpaKi+GzTZT2BNpV0/aLndK4mEUffpmWU1arEmQE8L+528wqcS eg== Received: (qmail 1666866 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2026 12:50:25 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 13 Jan 2026 12:50:25 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@FUTjmENItsIujnvx Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:50:25 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Andi Shyti , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Khalil Blaiech , Asmaa Mnebhi , Jean Delvare , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , Manivannan Sadhasivam , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] i2c: add and start using i2c_adapter-specific printk helpers Message-ID: References: <20251223-i2c-printk-helpers-v1-0-46a08306afdb@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > Yes, I agree it's too late to queue it for v7.0. I actually wanted to > rename my macro to i2c_debug() to avoid a conflict with saa7134 but > you're right, I may submit a patch for that instead for v7.0. Your choice. I think keeping 'i2c_dbg' is more consistent but the dependency on media might not be worth it. I set your patches to 'Deferred' in patchwork. Meaning that they will be handled as agreed above.