From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from thales.epochal.quest (thales.epochal.quest [51.222.15.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E893419D890 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.222.15.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731172657; cv=none; b=B0LjnIZ6a4YCpubQmiXbv4To6vIz2z2xPfdozlt4BK4jDwdg/LXGad5MRkJwXfsOGaWUyL1CadqiDL7XOL+403ZgM8QVlnavpIVN8GSmHtHWbZ/XTUeTUQY+ar7Obx1AnZhMl4+0U5zLu8zD4p4lu6f9sKQSqBrl9NYQQ/lFsvs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731172657; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TMDsyqDQ0pHvp2k1/uQnLMixLG+oX5cPjrDKtufuaPE=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=XomFbIPV/QUVlTqy6tb2Xm9JubTWLjnA0/RsCUNWXCIzjrzahqIOBR1s84Niq4Ilq0Ys465iX9YtlHczfgIUMdW4OqgvKMd+pOo1cM0/RI7WUvj3JoNlPiwIDfF9huJ3N2z3ibGhF7o227QqjpInU/SOxwCLykJiVrZICGGDKkU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=epochal.quest; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=epochal.quest; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=epochal.quest header.i=@epochal.quest header.b=bTOFOFM+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.222.15.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=epochal.quest Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=epochal.quest Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=epochal.quest header.i=@epochal.quest header.b="bTOFOFM+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=epochal.quest; s=default; t=1731172654; bh=TMDsyqDQ0pHvp2k1/uQnLMixLG+oX5cPjrDKtufuaPE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bTOFOFM+V+Vjnfh6JFW/4AI7emhyGc9yKxXwgL9v2C0SAPbobCZRpCWvbK8jAh0CG JgnaQDy0f7JnKDvq6owZa9n5GlgsmwAzliEyWdIdYyLSjf3gO4WNWq8F+Fcckpr7Em i58rutDcD6To0pOmyWxVyOwb2wb7E7QyziVBOUlYhV6OG2z7JBoAscQV/0Br2bJTRt +ajvY6ebHAU1/Ir+cl1zFhAhBI1JRdcTTPiSPBI+gXyYQc15Eu5+t4/+jW0E/M4/C6 ZitB/n6phl+HjeGfBtUB/9O7nAWF4r+3KDVB0rOxfXtnM0KaQE++9+ZMh2qevj8A01 vYouC3PadruzQ== X-Virus-Scanned: by epochal.quest Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 13:17:32 -0400 From: Cody Eksal To: wens@csie.org Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Maxime Ripard , Rob Herring , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Parthiban , Andre Przywara , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: a100: enable MMC clock reparenting In-Reply-To: References: <20241109003739.3440904-1-masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest> Message-ID: X-Sender: masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/11/09 12:02 pm, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > You should still keep the version number from the original series if > resending or increment it if changes were made. Noted, sorry; still getting used to LKML norms. Since I was resubmitting just this patch for stable, I wasn't sure what the norms were. The contents of the patch are unchanged from my series; the only modifications made were modifying the commit message and adding stable tags. Thanks! - Cody > > ChenYu