From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com (lelv0142.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA0A63A8E1 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 19:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="RxznrmQs" Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 409J4d0m002479; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:04:39 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1704827079; bh=+qOjCNdwumi7M253pRJB5h08L5CsGro6RhONwxvXlD0=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=RxznrmQsX8yQ1AC3oh7NhQTdnQ8dGYs8Yxu0PaLUiR4WxJ6TdQ7tZCS1kVZ1sRtyU AtDN7dUm/U3ws3jf6EHZ/qVWccOFi548eRAOvItVtlml0sZxykxwSOtggSI/zuR/nZ clvgtTbbXhJ6QRqD+eJ6T5GK3MsPSPXRgEcWrz/4= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 409J4dA9080614 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:04:39 -0600 Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:04:39 -0600 Received: from lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.250) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:04:39 -0600 Received: from [10.249.40.136] ([10.249.40.136]) by lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 409J4bgA086396; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:04:38 -0600 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:04:37 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: gpu: Rename img,powervr to img,powervr-rogue Content-Language: en-US To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Binns , Matt Coster , "H . Nikolaus Schaller" , Adam Ford , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , =?UTF-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Cousson?= , Tony Lindgren , Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tero Kristo , Paul Cercueil CC: , , , , , , References: <20240109171950.31010-1-afd@ti.com> <20240109171950.31010-2-afd@ti.com> <11e3afae-76a7-4ebb-82ac-3dca040710dc@linaro.org> From: Andrew Davis In-Reply-To: <11e3afae-76a7-4ebb-82ac-3dca040710dc@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 On 1/9/24 12:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 09/01/2024 18:19, Andrew Davis wrote: >> This binding will be used for GPUs starting from Series6 (Rogue) >> and later. A different binding document will describe Series5. >> With that the name "img,powervr" is too generic, rename to >> "img,powervr-rogue" to avoid confusion. >> >> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis >> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas >> Reviewed-by: Frank Binns >> --- > > Why do you send new version while we still talk about previous? > > Please implement feedback from v1 (and this is v2, so next is v3) or > keep discussing. > I agreed with everything you said in the last round (RFC v2) and made all requested changes. Did I miss something in this version? Thanks, Andrew > Best regards, > Krzysztof >