From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] soc/tegra: pmc: Drop locking from tegra_powergate_is_powered() Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:44:32 +0300 Message-ID: <11fc94af-efe2-e571-3163-efdaa91f34fc@gmail.com> References: <20181021183614.454-1-digetx@gmail.com> <4c318e6b-4841-dd52-d61d-1106c5f8afbc@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4c318e6b-4841-dd52-d61d-1106c5f8afbc@nvidia.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter , Thierry Reding Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 10/24/18 1:20 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 21/10/2018 19:36, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> This fixes splats like the one below if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y >> and machine (Tegra30) booted with SMP=n or all secondary CPU's are put >> offline. Locking isn't needed because it protects atomic operation. >> >> # echo 0 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[1-3]/online >> >> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:254 >> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 0, name: swapper/0 >> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G C 4.18.0-next-20180821-00180-gc3ebb6544e44-dirty #823 >> Hardware name: NVIDIA Tegra SoC (Flattened Device Tree) >> [] (unwind_backtrace) from [] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) >> [] (show_stack) from [] (dump_stack+0x94/0xa8) >> [] (dump_stack) from [] (___might_sleep+0x13c/0x174) >> [] (___might_sleep) from [] (__might_sleep+0x70/0xa8) >> [] (__might_sleep) from [] (mutex_lock+0x2c/0x70) >> [] (mutex_lock) from [] (tegra_powergate_is_powered+0x44/0xa8) >> [] (tegra_powergate_is_powered) from [] (tegra30_cpu_rail_off_ready+0x30/0x74) >> [] (tegra30_cpu_rail_off_ready) from [] (tegra30_idle_lp2+0xa0/0x108) >> [] (tegra30_idle_lp2) from [] (cpuidle_enter_state+0x140/0x540) >> [] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [] (cpuidle_enter+0x40/0x4c) >> [] (cpuidle_enter) from [] (call_cpuidle+0x30/0x48) >> [] (call_cpuidle) from [] (do_idle+0x238/0x28c) >> [] (do_idle) from [] (cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x2c) >> [] (cpu_startup_entry) from [] (rest_init+0xd8/0xdc) >> [] (rest_init) from [] (start_kernel+0x41c/0x430) >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko >> --- >> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c >> index 1fa840e3d930..1714cd818d69 100644 >> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c >> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c >> @@ -543,9 +543,7 @@ int tegra_powergate_is_powered(unsigned int id) >> if (!tegra_powergate_is_valid(id)) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> - mutex_lock(&pmc->powergates_lock); >> status = tegra_powergate_state(id); >> - mutex_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock); >> >> return status; > > Can we just ... > > return tegra_powergate_state(id); We can, but it is not necessary. Feel free to adjust the code as you wish while applying ;) I deliberately left the 'status' variable because I think that makes code a bit more expressive.