From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Ni Subject: Re: How to use the generic thermal sysfs. Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:48:42 +0800 Message-ID: <1343386122.4042.88.camel@tegra-chromium-2> References: <1342088573.27605.101.camel@tegra-chromium-2> <4D68720C2E767A4AA6A8796D42C8EB5915287C@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> <1342144273.1682.237.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> <1342164616.27605.129.camel@tegra-chromium-2> <1342165278.1682.259.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> <1343295094.4042.24.camel@tegra-chromium-2> <1343352098.1682.447.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> <1343357901.4042.70.camel@tegra-chromium-2> <20120727093037.094335eb@endymion.delvare> <1343374793.1682.475.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1343374793.1682.475.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Zhang Rui Cc: Jean Delvare , "R, Durgadoss" , "Brown, Len" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "joe@perches.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@ger.kernel.org" , Alex Courbot List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:39 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > On =E4=BA=94, 2012-07-27 at 09:30 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:58:21 +0800, Wei Ni wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 09:21 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > > > > is it possible to program the sensor at this time, in your own = thermal > > > > driver? > > >=20 > > > Since we are using the generic thermal driver lm90.c, I'm not sur= e if we > > > could program these limits in the generic driver, I think it's be= tter to > > > have a generic interface to set the limits, so I wish to add a > > > callback .set_limits() in the generic thermal framework. > >=20 > > I can confirm that hwmon drivers do not set limits, it is up to > > user-space to do it if they want. So if there is a need to do so in= the > > kernel itself, a proper interface at the generic thermal framework > > level seems appropriate. > >=20 > oh, setting limits from userspace? > I think you can program the senor when writing the trip point? > with this patch, > http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-acpi&m=3D134318814620429&w=3D2 Do you mean it can use .set_trip_temp() to set limits when writing the trip point? But I think this callback is used to change the trip_temp, it could not used to set the limits, in here the limit value is used to trigger the interrupt. >=20 > thanks, > rui >=20 >=20