From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pawel Moll Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] platform: Make platform_bus device a platform device Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:27:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1406125653.25343.141.camel@hornet> References: <20140722173713.GA8959@kroah.com> <1406051719-17354-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <20140722221619.GA15781@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140722221619.GA15781-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Olof Johansson , Stephen Warren , Catalin Marinas , "paul-DWxLp4Yu+b8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Peter De Schrijver , "arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 23:16 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 06:55:19PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > > ... describing the root of the device tree, so one can write > > a platform driver initializing the platform. > > > > There has been a lot of references to platform_bus device where > > it didn't make any sense, because simply using NULL as a parent > > will make the device be adopted by the top level anyway. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll > > --- > > Changes since v2: > > > > * replaced references to platform_bus.dev with NULL > > in places where it shouldn't make any difference > > How about split this up with just the "change to NULL" changes as one > patch, and the rest as a second one? Yes, was about to do exactly this. Pawel