From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 5/7] cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:27:51 +0300 Message-ID: <16bfccc5-36d5-3050-fd8d-5bce59e2d7b3@gmail.com> References: <5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <2c7a751a58adb4ce6f345dab9714b924504009b6.1562583394.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20190923135654.wcsdl5jdzxqeht3l@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190923135654.wcsdl5jdzxqeht3l@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , mka@chromium.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, pavel@ucw.cz, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org 23.09.2019 16:56, Viresh Kumar пишет: > On 22-09-19, 23:12, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> This patch causes use-after-free on a cpufreq driver module reload. Please take a look, thanks in advance. >> >> >> [ 87.952369] ================================================================== >> [ 87.953259] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in notifier_chain_register+0x4f/0x9c >> [ 87.954031] Read of size 4 at addr e6abbd0c by task modprobe/243 >> >> [ 87.954901] CPU: 1 PID: 243 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W >> 5.3.0-next-20190920-00185-gf61698eab956-dirty #2408 >> [ 87.956077] Hardware name: NVIDIA Tegra SoC (Flattened Device Tree) >> [ 87.956807] [] (unwind_backtrace) from [] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) >> [ 87.957709] [] (show_stack) from [] (dump_stack+0x89/0x98) >> [ 87.958616] [] (dump_stack) from [] >> (print_address_description.constprop.0+0x3d/0x340) >> [ 87.959785] [] (print_address_description.constprop.0) from [] >> (__kasan_report+0xe3/0x12c) >> [ 87.960907] [] (__kasan_report) from [] (notifier_chain_register+0x4f/0x9c) >> [ 87.962001] [] (notifier_chain_register) from [] >> (blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x29/0x3c) >> [ 87.963180] [] (blocking_notifier_chain_register) from [] >> (dev_pm_qos_add_notifier+0x79/0xf8) >> [ 87.964339] [] (dev_pm_qos_add_notifier) from [] (cpufreq_online+0x5e1/0x8a4) > > Hi Dmitry, > > Unfortunately I am traveling right now and can't test this stuff, though I may > have found the root cause here. Can you please test the below diff for me ? > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c > index 6c90fd7e2ff8..9ac244ee05fe 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c > @@ -328,6 +328,8 @@ void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev) > spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock); > > kfree(qos->resume_latency.notifiers); > + kfree(qos->min_frequency.notifiers); > + kfree(qos->max_frequency.notifiers); > kfree(qos); > > out: > Doesn't help. The use-after-free bugs are usually caused by a missing NULL assignment after kfree(), like in this snippet: .. if (!a) a = kmalloc(); .. kfree(a); // a = NULL <-- missing! .. I briefly looked through the code and don't see anything obviously wrong. The bug isn't critical since unlikely that somebody reloads cpufreq module for a non-development purposes, so it's not a big deal and can wait. Please take your time. I also want to point out that kernel crashes after second module reload, hence the KASAN report should be valid.