From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFD] PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS && !PM Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:35:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1995321.JkVMSghsar@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <565C7C86.7030801@nvidia.com> <565DBEE6.5030704@nvidia.com> <20151201161809.GA20561@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151201161809.GA20561@ulmo> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Jon Hunter , Kevin Hilman , Ulf Hansson , Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 05:18:09 PM Thierry Reding wrote: > [cut] > > That all sounds very complicated for little gain. Disabling PM doesn't > make much sense these days, so I'd personally be fine to unconditonally > enable PM on Tegra. I'm not sure what the correct way would be. Since > the PM symbol is user-visible, selecting it doesn't sound like a very > good solution, though a quick grep shows that some architectures do > this. > > Rafael, do you know what the canonical way is to make !PM invalid for a > platform? Well, good question. I can't really suggest anything cleaner than selecting it from the top-level Kconfig at the moment. Thanks, Rafael