From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/dt: tegra devicetree support Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:49:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20110720194915.GA26043@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20110719234158.2779.15394.stgit@ponder> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF049EBDEE27@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20110720160355.GB2406@sirena.org.uk> <20110720183133.GE4642@ponder.secretlab.ca> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF049EBDEF01@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20110720184758.GG4642@ponder.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110720184758.GG4642-e0URQFbLeQY2iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Stephen Warren , Erik Gilling , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Colin Cross , Olof Johansson , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:47:58PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > Sure, the tegra-wm8903 property can be dropped. If we start to see a > really well established pattern of the tegra paired with a wm8903, > then at that point we can define a compatible property for it and > document exactly what it means (document the boundaries and > assumptions that the compatible value requires). There is actually such a pattern, for various reasons a huge proportion of Tegra systems are straight clones of the reference designs and the reference designs mostly used WM8903.