From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:43:29 +0200 Message-ID: <201109201943.29510.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1316537186-26753-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1316537186-26753-1-git-send-email-swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Grant Likely , nicolas.pitre-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Olof Johansson , Shawn Guo , Chris Ball , linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > Acked-by: Olof Johansson > --- > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch, > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch? > Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should go into the same one. If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch. Arnd