From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: tegra: Switch to new pinctrl driver Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:16:18 -0800 Message-ID: <20120201081618.GJ7399@quad.lixom.net> References: <1327083746-31430-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <1327083746-31430-3-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Stephen Warren , Colin Cross , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:13:06AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > Yup, I've just been waiting on things to settle, > > bindings/implementation wise. Will look at it over the next day or two > > and get back. > > The only bindings you need to look into for this patch set should be > for the driver itself, the other muxmap bindings discussion I would > *very* much like to keep orthogonal to the review of this driver. Yup, it's more that I grouped the discussions together mentally and passed on all of them for a while. :) > I'm pretty scared of how device tree bindings seem to suck in > every discussion like a black hole and then explode in a myriad > fragmented discussions like a supernova :-P Yeah, welcome to the ugly side of device trees. Some things are easier and nicer to do there. Some things... are not. -Olof