From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [v2 1/1] memory: tegra{20,30}-mc: Use dev_err_ratelimited() Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:09:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20120514190925.GA4001@kroah.com> References: <1336981680-15297-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <1336990031-15567-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <4FB14FDE.2080409@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FB14FDE.2080409-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Hiroshi DOYU , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:33:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 05/14/2012 04:07 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > > Introduce a new dev_*_ratelimited() instead of pr_*_ratelimited() for > > better info to print. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU > > Acked-by: Stephen Warren > > But note that this relies on the following patch or a variant of it: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158899/ > > which isn't anywhere yet. > > (A variant of that patch was patch 1/2 the first time this patch was > posted, but v2 of this patch was posted separately without mentioning > the dependency) It was part of this thread, which I don't think you were copied on for some reason. Anyway, I applied it earlier today, thanks. greg k-h