From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: tegra: dt2 branch Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:25 +0000 Message-ID: <201205151143.26008.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1337016017-30537-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <201205142037.08752.arnd@arndb.de> <4FB170F3.8080107@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FB170F3.8080107-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Stephen Warren , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Monday 14 May 2012, Stephen Warren wrote: > I wonder if the changes to tegra-*.dtsi shouldn't just be dropped? I'd > personally err on the side of requiring board files to add this > property, rather than having things accidentally work because the .dtsi > file included a default. I ended up redoing the merge because I found an embarrasing typo in my patch and now dropped the property for the dtsi files. > BTW, I assume that in 3.6, I should plan to remove the support-8bit > properties and associated Tegra SDHCI driver code that handles them, and > rely on the SDHCI core handling this from now on? I think we can't drop it from the driver because of existing powerpc machines providing the property, but it would be ok if you drop it from your .dts files. Arnd