From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Allen Martin Subject: Re: Unifying device tree filenames, and U-Boot SoC name Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:01:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20120522010143.GF30009@nvidia.com> References: <4FB3E788.2040801@wwwdotorg.org> <20120521142214.GC21513@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Simon Glass Cc: Thierry Reding , Stephen Warren , Tom Warren , Olof Johansson , Colin Cross , U-Boot Mailing List , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:49:03PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Thierry Reding > wrote: > * Stephen Warren wrote: > > > > b) In U-Boot, rename the tegra2 support to tegra20 so that U-Boot ends > > up setting board_soc=tegra20, so this matches the .dts/.dtb filenames. > > This would involve renaming arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/ to > > ./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/ and editing boards.cfg to match, and > > possibly other related changes. > > > > This sounds like churn, but I think we could easily fold this into > > Allen's series that moves the tegra2 directory in order to put it in a > > common place for separate SPL/non-SPL builds to avoid doing this kind of > > thing multiple times. > > > > Does anyone think this is a good/bad/... idea? Thanks. > > I like it. It's better to have the names consistent. > > Sounds good to me, too. I'm fine with the proposal, I'll roll it into my SPL patch series which I need to post a new version of anyway. -Allen -- nvpublic