From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: Power sequences upstreaming (Was: Re: [PATCH] tegra: ventana: display and backlight DT entries) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:25:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20121115062502.GA27702@lizard> References: <1352802204-1740-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <193309413.vmBPZntXg4@percival> <20121115060310.GA26076@lizard> <2322802.yJhDIQtgoO@percival> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2322802.yJhDIQtgoO@percival> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alex Courbot Cc: Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Mark Zhang , David Woodhouse List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:09:10PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > > The feature has gone through 5 review cycles, received some Acks and is > > > being used by the pwm-backlight driver and very probably others in the > > > future (I am particularly thinking about the panel framework which is > > > likely to need them). We would like to push Tegra display support in 3.8, > > > and this feature will be needed to support our reference boards. Please > > > let me know if you would be the right intermediate or if I should ask > > > someone else. > > > > Sure, I can easily pull your tree (assuming you guys agree on the > > subsystem design, i.e. if the code has no strong NAKs). > > Excellent, thanks - when would you need the code in order to be on time for > 3.8? Generally, that would be one week before the merge window, i.e. when Linus announces that some -rc is the last one. Thanks, Anton.