From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: tegra: common clock framework fixes Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:43:58 +0000 Message-ID: <201302192143.59019.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1360780358-2866-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1360780358-2866-1-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 13 February 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > A number of small fixes are included to the new Tegra common clock > driver. These are: Missing locking, definition of device tree clock IDs > not matching the binding, a static cleanup, missing initialization of > some UART clocks. > > This branch is based on Tegra's previous pull request tegra-for-3.9-dt. > This dependency is caused by the one patch that edits the device tree. > If this causes a problem, I can drop the final two patches in this pull > request for now, and rebase it onto previous tegra-for-3.9-soc-ccf > instead. It's not ideal, but I've merged them into next/dt now because of this dependency. The order of the next/* branches in arm-soc is fixed now because of other dependencies, so putting it into next/soc would have been equally wrong. I think a better solution would have been to send two pull requests, where one was based on the ccf branch and the other on the dt branch. Arnd