Re: [RESEND/PATCH] usb: host: ehci-tegra: fix PHY error handling

[Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1678 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:39:57PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >>>>On 03/21/2013 06:23 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>>>>PHY layer no longer returns NULL, we must switch from
> >>>>>IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to IS_ERR().
> >>>>The patches that I'll put into my topic branch are not yet
> >>>>complete; Venu first posted them a couple days back and there are
> >>>>a number of issues that will require a repost.
> >>>is your topic branch ready now ? I'm about to close my tree for
> >>>v3.10, we already have -rc5 tagged and I want to leave my pull
> >>>request cooking in next for a while.
> >>Unfortunately not.
> >>
> >>Venu's patch series had a bunch of runtime bugs, and I also found out
> >>that the DT binding /still/ wasn't fully thought out. As such, this
> >>series won't be applied for 3.10.
> >>
> >>I still have a vague (and probably naive) hope that the updated
> >>bindings and DT file modifications can be applied on the Tegra side in
> >>the next few days so that for 3.11 there won't be any inter-tree
> >>dependencies. However, we'll just have to wait and see whether Venu
> >>has found the bugs yet.
> >alright, so I'll go ahead and close my 'next' branch for v3.10,
> >tomorrow. Leave it in linux-next for a few days and send my pull request
> >to Greg by Friday.
> >
> >Let me just check if there are any other important features to go in
> >v3.10 which won't cause big regressions.
> 
>    I was going to post some cleanup/features for
> drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c today
> or tomorrow. So am I already late for 3.10?

if it comes today (before midnight in UTC +2, so in less than 3 hours),
I can still apply.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]