Re: [PATCH resend 1/2] clk: tegra: remove USB from clk init table

[Mike Turquette <mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-04-17 10:29:47)
> On 04/15/2013 01:31 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > The USB clocks are just clock gates, so no need to set a specific clock.
> > In fact trying to set a specific clock is just a NOP if the requested
> > clockrate is the same as those of the parent (clk_m) or will trigger a
> > WARN_ON() if rates don't match up.
> > 
> > As we are not setting a specific rate, nor activating the clocks at
> > init, there is no point in keeping the the usb entries in the clock init
> > table.
> 
> Lucas, these two patches look good for me. I'm just waiting on Mike's
> ack to forward them to arm-soc. If that doesn't happen today, feel free
> to forward them to arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org when it does, with a note requesting
> they be applied since I'm away on vacation. It might be useful for them
> to know that they're best applied wherever Tegra's for-3.10/clk branch
> was merged.
> 
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> (Tested for regressions; I didn't actually test using the AC'97 clock,
> since I don't have the HW)

Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>