From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heikki Krogerus Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] net: rfkill: gpio: cleanup and a few new acpi ids Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:01:47 +0300 Message-ID: <20140409100147.GB3083@xps8300> References: <1396360976-28657-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <1396946275.5936.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1396946275.5936.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Berg , Stephen Warren Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Rhyland Klein , Marc Dietrich , Linus Walleij , Arnd Bergmann , Alexandre Courbot , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:37:55AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > I hope this one is OK with everyone. > > It's fine with me. Are you expecting me to pick up any of these patches, > or do you want them to go through some other tree? Either way is fine > with me, but the first patch looks like something I probably shouldn't > be taking. The second patch depends on it. Stephen! Are you expecting any changes to board-paz00.c in this kernel cycle? If not, I think it would be easiest if Johannes, you take the whole set. What do you guys think? Thanks, -- heikki