From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] ARM: tegra: Move SoC drivers to drivers/soc/tegra Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:31:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20140717093149.GB3180@arm.com> References: <1403888329-24755-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <53AEF81D.3080408@ti.com> <20140628204025.GA16415@ulmo> <7497427.LQy8pJts8f@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Thierry Reding , Santosh Shilimkar , Stephen Warren , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kumar Gala , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:31:00PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote: > [ Gee, I had completely missed this thread because nobody bothered to > cc me. Seems to be standard procedure on 64-bit these days. :( ] Just to clarify this point, as per prior agreement I'm expecting the arm-soc guys to help reviewing/merging arm64-soc as well, even though there are no arch/arm64/{mach,plat}-* directories. That means that arm-soc folks should also be cc'ed on such patches. However, the "ARM SUB-ARCHITECTURES" MAINTAINERS entry does not mention arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org (neither Olof nor Arnd). Was this not meant as an arm-soc email alias? -- Catalin