From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Copy register_persistent_clock() to arm64 source subtree Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 10:40:26 +0000 Message-ID: <20141107104025.GC4585@leverpostej> References: <1415319665-21701-1-git-send-email-anatol.pomozov@gmail.com> <545C4783.8070506@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <545C4783.8070506-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Anatol Pomozov , Marc Zyngier , Lorenzo Pieralisi , LKML , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:16:03AM +0000, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/06/2014 05:25 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > > +Stephen > > > > This patch is for tegra20_timer that uses register_persistent_clock(). > > I did not find any way to share the same arch code for arm/arm64. > > > > Actually this register_persistent_clock() does not look arm specific > > at all. Would it be better to move it somewhere outside of arch/? > > No CC to linux-tegra@ or the other Tegra maintainers? > > Yes, I think it'd be best not to have arch-specific APIs, or cut/paste > the same code into multiple places. Agreed. This looks in no way architecture specific, and having this in common code would be preferable to copying. Mark.