Re: [PATCH 5/8] thermal:cpu cooling:tegra: Provide deferred probing for tegra driver

[Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1240 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:02:42PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> When CPU freq is used as a thermal zone cooling device, one needs to wait
> until cpufreq subsystem is properly initialized.
> 
> This code is similar to the one already available in imx_thermal.c file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c
> index 70f7e9e..9c5aaa4 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>  #include <linux/thermal.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>  
>  #include <soc/tegra/fuse.h>
>  
> @@ -346,6 +347,12 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	const struct tegra_tsensor *tsensors = t124_tsensors;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL
> +	if (!cpufreq_get_current_driver()) {
> +		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "no cpufreq driver!");

Shouldn't this rather be dev_err() or dev_warn() to give at least some
clue as to the cause?

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]