From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] thermal:cpu cooling:tegra: Provide deferred probing for tegra driver Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:51:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20141117135142.6692c9d5@amdc2363> References: <1411547232-21493-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1415898165-27406-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1415898165-27406-6-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <5465DDC5.6090301@kapsi.fi> <20141114122437.6742ea68@amdc2363> <20141117115743.GG25699@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20141117115743.GG25699@ulmo> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Mikko Perttunen , Eduardo Valentin , Zhang Rui , Ezequiel Garcia , Kuninori Morimoto , Linux PM list , Vincenzo Frascino , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Lukasz Majewski , Nobuhiro Iwamatsu , Mikko Perttunen , Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Hi Thierry, > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:24:37PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Hi Mikko, > > > > > Tested-by: Mikko Perttunen > > > > Thanks for testing. > > > > > > > > One potential issue I can see is that if the cpufreq driver fails > > > to probe then you'll never get the thermal driver either. For > > > example, Tegra124 currently has no cpufreq driver, so if > > > CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL was enabled, then the soctherm driver would > > > never be able to probe. > > > > Yes, this is a potential issue. However, this option in > > tegra_defconfig is by default disabled when thermal is enabled. > > Not everybody uses tegra_defconfig for their kernel builds. In fact > I'd imagine that the majority of kernels use a variant of > multi_v7_defconfig and therefore CPU_THERMAL might get enabled > irrespective of any Tegra support. I see your point. > > I think a better solution would be to add this check only when proper > support for CPU frequency based cooling is added. That is, when a call > to cpufreq_cooling_register() (or a variant thereof) is added. For the above reason the code is only compiled in when user enable CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL. > > But while at it, why not make it so that cpufreq_cooling_register() > detects if a cpufreq driver has been registered yet and propagate > -EPROBE_DEFER if necessary? cpufreq_cooling_register() may be a good place to add check for deferred probe. The problem with cpufreq_cooling_register() is that it may be called late in the probe function (as it is done now in Exynos). > > Thierry -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group