From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/3] mxs: add driver for ocotp in i.MX23 and i.MX28 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:02:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20150109100206.GE27845@ulmo> References: <1413628372-2809-1-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> <2223659.OW08fe0cS1@wuerfel> <1003885907.22061.1415301932743.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbsltgw00.schlund.de> <6087001.lBonPVHV5K@wuerfel> <54AE8D45.7050805@imgtec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZInfyf7laFu/Kiw7" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54AE8D45.7050805-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Stefan Wahren , mhei-Z/Lg1yOAjpkb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org, shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, festevam-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Maxime Ripard , James Hartley , Andrew Bresticker , Naidu Tellapati , Peter De Schrijver , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org --ZInfyf7laFu/Kiw7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:59:33AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hi Stefan, Arnd, >=20 > (I'm trimming the Cc list and adding Thierry and Maxime to the loop): >=20 > On 11/06/2014 04:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > [..] > >> > >> i don't have a answer to this question, but how about changing fsl_oco= tp driver > >> to driver/soc/mxs/fuse with a similiar binary interface like the tegra= ones. > >> > >> Does it make sense to you? > >=20 > > I haven't looked at the drivers, so I don't know if the tegra interface > > is any better or worse than the others. Changing everyone to have the s= ame > > interface is definitely a good idea, but of course only if the unified > > interface is a good one ;-) > >=20 >=20 > I'm in the process of finding a suitable upstream path for a new eFuse dr= iver > for fuses used on Imagination Technologies SoCs. >=20 > This was our last proposal, which follows Tegra's work: >=20 > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg59246.html >=20 > However, Arnd was reluctant to take yet another efuse driver under driver= s/soc > and proposed instead to try to find a unified API. We've had numerous fuse > drivers (tegra, sunxi, imx and img) appearing, so his concern certainly m= akes > sense. >=20 > I've talked to Arnd on IRC and we agreed to create a new directory > drivers/efuse. As a first step we would just move the tegra driver, > and add the new drivers (img on my side, and possibly mxs on Stefan's). > Perhaps we would also pull the sunxi_sid driver as well. >=20 > Having the drivers together would allow us to come up with a unified API > as follow up work. >=20 > How does this sound? If you have no objections to this, I can go ahead and > try to prepare some RFCs. No objections from me. Adding Peter and linux-tegra for visibility. Thierry --ZInfyf7laFu/Kiw7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUr6ceAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhjLUQAKwyQ/6g6FpUywRJX0Xyit+G QDhofo8nDA5myoDOgw+o+19A5v05gXLaxKxe1cW7ge1mPLSD3kn+gHdKM2wC2Tam ircaEVfRan3uE1wIWko5kB17Lx2NdpoBAgHTKlrgF18MmzlcWbnvxi+x6YVC+hdI h42KB6STtHSvZvVZMoQHe+JcsoJIjOWiXQRTo645mf62AYMbZEiwvGxsq5WnJJSA ej7XAVVBDqYhqF70D0RS4zUVOj34vA8tVhBksXj89Jx1FH+Sv2LZGfi7lY+megfl w6PrX0Dh8CPJ8nmmjULGFG3zPKmAE8Zj9vQyDFO8mwTEWd2VOeK+Uv9u8tY8O2Y0 0QLBBBCy2P/s6X5DJxXZ1C763gzYp27yLevXegzjKORRFDPkcUzqWExU1x+wiKGS d3nb0O7TwXT11zR2XKg42RMJjU9IoP2rwPH/pfuZYNN26zFltHo/TqHGoB7fAiKl Nmvfba8Tdox3bZN2gEB7Y/lDnaLm5sIqhN3NnaxoMLFWduclXF5oXDZy0Vjc/P+d Ab59nrWTVGLlrRoiZTjfWtJBlIhx+pc09+wQIAvJth4fUZKE4f8ufzRBKdBXWPtZ YWW9+rb7HEkDkL13pNlXpFzw37UGwDv8MSycSbdJn0Q3W+ba4h7ndoI+XuEFQEAQ oJztMSdrCSIcgJtIzwJt =w2AH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZInfyf7laFu/Kiw7--