Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1161 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 16:42:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > 
> > TEGRA folks: the tegra_read_persistent_clock() implementation apparently
> > predates the Tegra RTC driver and I wonder if they actually do the
> > right thing in combination. Could it be that the wall time forwards
> > twice as fast as it should during resume when the RTC driver is loaded?
> > Could it be that we can simply remove  tegra_read_persistent_clock()
> > and the register_persistent_clock() infrastructure?
> > 
> 
> I found the 'sleeptime_injected' variable now, which takes care of
> forwarding the clock by the correct amount.
> 
> I also found the CLOCK_SOURCE_SUSPEND_NONSTOP flag next to it, which
> should let us use the counter32k driver to provide the correct
> time during suspend without the omap_read_persistent_clock() function.
> We should be able to just delete that code.
> 
> If we decide to also delete the tegra_read_persistent_clock()
> function, we can remove the registration too.

cool, I'll try to have a look at that after this series gets accepted.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]