Re: [PATCH V6 00/10] Add generic PM domain support for Tegra

Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-02T23:07:31Z

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:48:34PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Adds generic PM domain support for Tegra SoCs but this series only
>>> enables support for it on Tegra 64-bit devices. There is no reason why
>>> this cannot be enable for Tegra 32-bit devices, but to keep the patch
>>> series to a minimum only 64-bit devices are enabled so far.
>>>
>>> This series has been boot tested on Tegra210 as well as various 32-bit
>>> Tegra platforms.
>
> [...]
>
>>> Jon Hunter (10):
>>> PM / Domains: Fix removal of a subdomain
>>> PM / Domains: Add function to get the last domain added
>>> PM / Domains: Add function to remove a pm-domain
>>
>> Ulf, Kevin, Rafael,
>>
>> It's too late to take these patches through the Tegra tree for v4.6, but
>> if Jon can get the above three patches ready before the merge window,
>> would you be willing to pick them up into your trees for v4.6?
>
> It's a bit late in the cycle, but since one is a fix and the other two
> add functions that aren't (yet) used, I think it would be fine to get
> them in for v4.6. But, the final decision is with Rafael.
>
>> Doing so
>> might make it easier to deal with the dependencies. The prerequisites
>> would already be in Linus' tree when I apply the Tegra bits for v4.7.
>
> Yeah, makes sense.
>
>> I don't mind taking all of it through the Tegra tree for v4.7, though. I
>> can provide a stable branch with the PM / Domains patches for you to
>> pull in, in case there are any conflicts.
>
> I think it makes the most sense for these prereqs to merge through
> linux-pm. Let's see what Rafael thinks about the timing.

The timing is fine by me.

Do you want me to apply [1-3/10] from this series, then?

Thanks,
Rafael