From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: fix missing include Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:55:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20160610145520.GP27142@ulmo.ba.sec> References: <1465404897-16654-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <20160610142210.GN27142@ulmo.ba.sec> <575ACFB5.4070706@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDuspjMMC1Ui5ypn" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <575ACFB5.4070706-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: Ben Dooks , linux-kernel-81qHHgoATdFT9dQujB1mzip2UmYkHbXO@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org --NDuspjMMC1Ui5ypn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:33:25PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: >=20 > On 10/06/16 15:22, Thierry Reding wrote: > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > >=20 > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:54:57PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > >> The prototype of tegra_cpuidle_pcie_irqs_in_use() is missing > >> from the cpuidle.c file, it is defined in > >> so add that include to avoid the following warning: > >> > >> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle.c:51:6: warning: symbol 'tegra_cpuidle_pci= e_irqs_in_use' was not declared. Should it be static? > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > >> --- > >> Cc: Stephen Warren > >> Cc: Alexandre Courbot > >> Cc: Thierry Reding > >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org > >> Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > >> --- > >> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle.c | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >=20 > > I've been carrying a set of patches to fix these, and a couple of other > > sparse warnings, in my tree locally, but never sent them out because > > they were so trivial. I probably should've to avoid the duplication of > > effort. Sorry about that. >=20 > I think you did send them out ;-) >=20 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616249/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616250/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616251/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616252/ Hah! Excellent. No more guilty conscience for me. =3D) I've pulled those patches into the Tegra tree now. Thanks, Thierry --NDuspjMMC1Ui5ypn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXWtTYAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOh9IwP/RMQ03M5Rh1PxvN9Y0CF6CGG bEIQ6BWva923Dbwna4aljutJl3gMq8AZyLod8A8lbmrPBR1LkZZ+K5UNr1+mIhv5 /Ad2myRWQMNsDVZdpvbKK9tU7OFSxUezgYMG9WTXSqYUtGeeItS0isd79RSwf6rA svjJFnKBEIbUX3GLQlKDBNzagk3jzuCpNvIoe8dwmkMSg5Fb3XbkczOJVJcls3+I N9QKwSBOCHnr7JmcSS1BHATvlfpKnCBVjaRy30Loc4GkPOcagczTtIv38uPAVQJz uVZ2sO3Ehww5qwXoTXaB/5Q951iFd93vUt1k4wG3w+9td2M80MQxVnTca64MKjhr K4jQVhIouHZQkIxpVoMPm/3ZcpoWCtkWJWcMMnnUBQJe/6BDpURUi8iBLSXZuvPO /tu8T1vJ6/qFpR/BqRwHw4Mhu62mguFBUxwt6DUctqw2REvjttcyXFTgM8U5uzPm /gyn6OPL70oRW4dRfhDN5sL91Bvh3ROXssRTzoGY2A03Tk4y3XPhvxWJXg3GeFfx 5AFzo01gnLaztHxt31AKfCdqir9LX93RbcVhVE1iNVoLinS46xTigpx9TJUOX+7N M6X++JKf55mPy+3+0fNdfwwp44IO8Ohhq/LQnne9fdTw8wfC3vhBH+zg/9nBicc7 Rom+TteesSrQGssabpvv =DeIK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDuspjMMC1Ui5ypn--