From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: tegra: actually program REFCLK_CFG* on recent SoCs
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:47:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160630134728.GE26758@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160624143703.13231-1-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2773 bytes --]
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:37:03AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>
> On recent SoCs, tegra_pcie_phy_enable() isn't called; but instead
> tegra_pcie_enable_controller() calls tegra_xusb_phy_enable(). However,
> part of tegra_pcie_phy_enable() needs to happen in all cases. Move that
> code to tegra_pcie_port_enable() instead.
>
> For reference, NVIDIA's downstream Linux kernel performs this operation
> in tegra_pcie_enable_rp_features(), which is called immediately after
> tegra_pcie_port_enable(). Since that function doesn't exist in the mainline
> driver, we'll just add it to the tail of tegra_pcie_port_enable() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> index 74887fedc3d4..2ec64a9e7943 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> @@ -541,12 +541,13 @@ static void tegra_pcie_port_reset(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>
> static void tegra_pcie_port_enable(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
> {
> - const struct tegra_pcie_soc_data *soc = port->pcie->soc_data;
> + struct tegra_pcie *pcie = port->pcie;
> + const struct tegra_pcie_soc_data *soc = pcie->soc_data;
> unsigned long ctrl = tegra_pcie_port_get_pex_ctrl(port);
> unsigned long value;
>
> /* enable reference clock */
> - value = afi_readl(port->pcie, ctrl);
> + value = afi_readl(pcie, ctrl);
> value |= AFI_PEX_CTRL_REFCLK_EN;
>
> if (soc->has_pex_clkreq_en)
> @@ -554,9 +555,14 @@ static void tegra_pcie_port_enable(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>
> value |= AFI_PEX_CTRL_OVERRIDE_EN;
>
> - afi_writel(port->pcie, value, ctrl);
> + afi_writel(pcie, value, ctrl);
>
> tegra_pcie_port_reset(port);
> +
> + /* Configure the reference clock driver */
> + pads_writel(pcie, soc->pads_refclk_cfg0, PADS_REFCLK_CFG0);
> + if (soc->num_ports > 2)
> + pads_writel(pcie, soc->pads_refclk_cfg1, PADS_REFCLK_CFG1);
> }
This will actually write these two registers for each enabled port,
which, while it shouldn't make a difference, is unnecessary. I've
applied a slightly modified version of this patch. Specifically I moved
this code to the tail of the tegra_pcie_phy_power_on() function, which
is closest to where it was before.
I've also applied the patch that changes the values that are written
into this register, though I reversed the order because that made more
sense to me. I've pushed both patches to the for-4.8/pci branch in the
Tegra tree, can you please take a look if that still looks okay to you?
Thierry
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-24 14:37 [PATCH] pci: tegra: actually program REFCLK_CFG* on recent SoCs Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <20160624143703.13231-1-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-26 2:54 ` Simon Glass
2016-06-30 13:47 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2016-06-30 15:49 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160630134728.GE26758@ulmo.ba.sec \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox