* [PATCH V2] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Really fix runtime-pm usage
@ 2017-06-06 12:49 Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <1496753369-5356-1-git-send-email-jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2017-06-06 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laxman Dewangan, Vinod Koul
Cc: Thierry Reding, dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Jon Hunter
Commit edd3bdbe9db1 ("dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage")
added pm_runtime_get/put() calls to the tegra-apb DMA system suspend
callbacks. Runtime PM is disabled during system suspend and so these
APIs cannot be used. Fix the suspend handling for the tegra-apb DMA by
moving the save and restore of the DMA register context into the
runtime PM suspend and resume callbacks, and then use the
pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() APIs to invoke the runtime PM
callbacks during system suspend.
Fixes: edd3bdbe9db1 ("dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage")
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
Changes since V1:
- Drop the custom suspend/resume callbacks and use
pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume directly in SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS.
drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 50 +++++++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
index 3722b9d8d9fe..b9d75a54c896 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
@@ -1494,35 +1494,7 @@ static int tegra_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int tegra_dma_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-
- clk_disable_unprepare(tdma->dma_clk);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int tegra_dma_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
-{
- struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- int ret;
-
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(tdma->dma_clk);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-static int tegra_dma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
-{
- struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
int i;
- int ret;
-
- /* Enable clock before accessing register */
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
tdma->reg_gen = tdma_read(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_GENERAL);
for (i = 0; i < tdma->chip_data->nr_channels; i++) {
@@ -1543,21 +1515,21 @@ static int tegra_dma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_WCOUNT);
}
- /* Disable clock */
- pm_runtime_put(dev);
+ clk_disable_unprepare(tdma->dma_clk);
+
return 0;
}
-static int tegra_dma_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
+static int tegra_dma_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- int i;
- int ret;
+ int i, ret;
- /* Enable clock before accessing register */
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
- if (ret < 0)
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(tdma->dma_clk);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
+ }
tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_GENERAL, tdma->reg_gen);
tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_CONTROL, 0);
@@ -1582,16 +1554,14 @@ static int tegra_dma_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
(ch_reg->csr & ~TEGRA_APBDMA_CSR_ENB));
}
- /* Disable clock */
- pm_runtime_put(dev);
return 0;
}
-#endif
static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops = {
SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_runtime_suspend, tegra_dma_runtime_resume,
NULL)
- SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_pm_suspend, tegra_dma_pm_resume)
+ SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend,
+ pm_runtime_force_resume)
};
static const struct of_device_id tegra_dma_of_match[] = {
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1496753369-5356-1-git-send-email-jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH V2] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Really fix runtime-pm usage [not found] ` <1496753369-5356-1-git-send-email-jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2017-06-06 14:48 ` Thierry Reding 2017-06-27 11:44 ` Jon Hunter 2017-06-30 5:44 ` Vinod Koul 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Thierry Reding @ 2017-06-06 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jon Hunter Cc: Laxman Dewangan, Vinod Koul, dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3821 bytes --] On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 01:49:29PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > Commit edd3bdbe9db1 ("dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage") > added pm_runtime_get/put() calls to the tegra-apb DMA system suspend > callbacks. Runtime PM is disabled during system suspend and so these > APIs cannot be used. Fix the suspend handling for the tegra-apb DMA by > moving the save and restore of the DMA register context into the > runtime PM suspend and resume callbacks, and then use the > pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() APIs to invoke the runtime PM > callbacks during system suspend. > > Fixes: edd3bdbe9db1 ("dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage") > > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > --- > > Changes since V1: > - Drop the custom suspend/resume callbacks and use > pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume directly in SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS. > > drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 50 +++++++++---------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c > index 3722b9d8d9fe..b9d75a54c896 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c > @@ -1494,35 +1494,7 @@ static int tegra_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > static int tegra_dma_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > { > struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > - > - clk_disable_unprepare(tdma->dma_clk); > - return 0; > -} > - > -static int tegra_dma_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > -{ > - struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > - int ret; > - > - ret = clk_prepare_enable(tdma->dma_clk); > - if (ret < 0) { > - dev_err(dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); > - return ret; > - } > - return 0; > -} > - > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > -static int tegra_dma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) > -{ > - struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > int i; > - int ret; > - > - /* Enable clock before accessing register */ > - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > - if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > > tdma->reg_gen = tdma_read(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_GENERAL); > for (i = 0; i < tdma->chip_data->nr_channels; i++) { > @@ -1543,21 +1515,21 @@ static int tegra_dma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) > TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_WCOUNT); > } > > - /* Disable clock */ > - pm_runtime_put(dev); > + clk_disable_unprepare(tdma->dma_clk); > + > return 0; > } > > -static int tegra_dma_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > +static int tegra_dma_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > { > struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > - int i; > - int ret; > + int i, ret; > > - /* Enable clock before accessing register */ > - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > - if (ret < 0) > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(tdma->dma_clk); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); > return ret; > + } > > tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_GENERAL, tdma->reg_gen); > tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_CONTROL, 0); > @@ -1582,16 +1554,14 @@ static int tegra_dma_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > (ch_reg->csr & ~TEGRA_APBDMA_CSR_ENB)); > } > > - /* Disable clock */ > - pm_runtime_put(dev); > return 0; > } > -#endif > > static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops = { > SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_runtime_suspend, tegra_dma_runtime_resume, > NULL) > - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_pm_suspend, tegra_dma_pm_resume) > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, > + pm_runtime_force_resume) Is that even necessary? I thought runtime PM was going to be triggered for system sleep anyway, but it looks like there are other examples of this usage, so maybe I'm mistaken. Thierry [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Really fix runtime-pm usage 2017-06-06 14:48 ` Thierry Reding @ 2017-06-27 11:44 ` Jon Hunter [not found] ` <f336e72a-d966-11e4-0885-e324843d5c00-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jon Hunter @ 2017-06-27 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thierry Reding, Vinod Koul Cc: Laxman Dewangan, dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 06/06/17 15:48, Thierry Reding wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 01:49:29PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Commit edd3bdbe9db1 ("dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage") >> added pm_runtime_get/put() calls to the tegra-apb DMA system suspend >> callbacks. Runtime PM is disabled during system suspend and so these >> APIs cannot be used. Fix the suspend handling for the tegra-apb DMA by >> moving the save and restore of the DMA register context into the >> runtime PM suspend and resume callbacks, and then use the >> pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() APIs to invoke the runtime PM >> callbacks during system suspend. >> >> Fixes: edd3bdbe9db1 ("dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage") >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> >> --- >> >> Changes since V1: >> - Drop the custom suspend/resume callbacks and use >> pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume directly in SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS. >> >> drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 50 +++++++++---------------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c >> index 3722b9d8d9fe..b9d75a54c896 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c >> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c >> @@ -1494,35 +1494,7 @@ static int tegra_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> static int tegra_dma_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >> { >> struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> - >> - clk_disable_unprepare(tdma->dma_clk); >> - return 0; >> -} >> - >> -static int tegra_dma_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >> -{ >> - struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> - int ret; >> - >> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(tdma->dma_clk); >> - if (ret < 0) { >> - dev_err(dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); >> - return ret; >> - } >> - return 0; >> -} >> - >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> -static int tegra_dma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) >> -{ >> - struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> int i; >> - int ret; >> - >> - /* Enable clock before accessing register */ >> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); >> - if (ret < 0) >> - return ret; >> >> tdma->reg_gen = tdma_read(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_GENERAL); >> for (i = 0; i < tdma->chip_data->nr_channels; i++) { >> @@ -1543,21 +1515,21 @@ static int tegra_dma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) >> TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_WCOUNT); >> } >> >> - /* Disable clock */ >> - pm_runtime_put(dev); >> + clk_disable_unprepare(tdma->dma_clk); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> -static int tegra_dma_pm_resume(struct device *dev) >> +static int tegra_dma_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >> { >> struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> - int i; >> - int ret; >> + int i, ret; >> >> - /* Enable clock before accessing register */ >> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); >> - if (ret < 0) >> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(tdma->dma_clk); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); >> return ret; >> + } >> >> tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_GENERAL, tdma->reg_gen); >> tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_CONTROL, 0); >> @@ -1582,16 +1554,14 @@ static int tegra_dma_pm_resume(struct device *dev) >> (ch_reg->csr & ~TEGRA_APBDMA_CSR_ENB)); >> } >> >> - /* Disable clock */ >> - pm_runtime_put(dev); >> return 0; >> } >> -#endif >> >> static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops = { >> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_runtime_suspend, tegra_dma_runtime_resume, >> NULL) >> - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_pm_suspend, tegra_dma_pm_resume) >> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, >> + pm_runtime_force_resume) > > Is that even necessary? I thought runtime PM was going to be triggered > for system sleep anyway, but it looks like there are other examples of > this usage, so maybe I'm mistaken. Yes this is necessary. No RPM is not automatically trigger by system suspend AFAICT. Cheers Jon -- nvpublic ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <f336e72a-d966-11e4-0885-e324843d5c00-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH V2] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Really fix runtime-pm usage [not found] ` <f336e72a-d966-11e4-0885-e324843d5c00-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2017-06-30 5:42 ` Vinod Koul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2017-06-30 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jon Hunter Cc: Thierry Reding, Laxman Dewangan, dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:44:58PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > >> static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops = { > >> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_runtime_suspend, tegra_dma_runtime_resume, > >> NULL) > >> - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_pm_suspend, tegra_dma_pm_resume) > >> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, > >> + pm_runtime_force_resume) > > > > Is that even necessary? I thought runtime PM was going to be triggered > > for system sleep anyway, but it looks like there are other examples of > > this usage, so maybe I'm mistaken. > > Yes this is necessary. No RPM is not automatically trigger by system > suspend AFAICT. Yes I was earlier under the same impression but later did realize that the behaviour seems to be arch specific and we don't have guarantee on this -- ~Vinod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Really fix runtime-pm usage [not found] ` <1496753369-5356-1-git-send-email-jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2017-06-06 14:48 ` Thierry Reding @ 2017-06-30 5:44 ` Vinod Koul 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2017-06-30 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jon Hunter Cc: Laxman Dewangan, Thierry Reding, dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 01:49:29PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > Commit edd3bdbe9db1 ("dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage") > added pm_runtime_get/put() calls to the tegra-apb DMA system suspend > callbacks. Runtime PM is disabled during system suspend and so these > APIs cannot be used. Fix the suspend handling for the tegra-apb DMA by > moving the save and restore of the DMA register context into the > runtime PM suspend and resume callbacks, and then use the > pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() APIs to invoke the runtime PM > callbacks during system suspend. Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-30 5:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-06 12:49 [PATCH V2] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Really fix runtime-pm usage Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <1496753369-5356-1-git-send-email-jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-06 14:48 ` Thierry Reding
2017-06-27 11:44 ` Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <f336e72a-d966-11e4-0885-e324843d5c00-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-30 5:42 ` Vinod Koul
2017-06-30 5:44 ` Vinod Koul
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox