On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 02:58:43AM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > The for_each_child_of_node macro itself maintains the correct reference > count of the nodes so the explicit of_node_put() call causes a warning: > > [ 0.098960] OF: ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on /pmc@7000e400/powergates/xusba > [ 0.098981] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.11.3 #1-NixOS > [ 0.098996] Hardware name: NVIDIA Jetson TX1 Developer Kit (DT) > [ 0.099011] Call trace: > [ 0.099034] [] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2a0 > [ 0.099051] [] show_stack+0x24/0x30 > [ 0.099069] [] dump_stack+0x9c/0xc0 > [ 0.099090] [] of_node_release+0xa4/0xa8 > [ 0.099107] [] kobject_put+0x90/0x1f8 > [ 0.099124] [] of_node_put+0x24/0x30 > [ 0.099140] [] __of_get_next_child+0x4c/0x70 > [ 0.099155] [] of_get_next_child+0x40/0x68 > [ 0.099173] [] tegra_pmc_early_init+0x4e8/0x5ac > [ 0.099189] [] do_one_initcall+0x5c/0x168 > [ 0.099206] [] kernel_init_freeable+0xd4/0x240 > [ 0.099224] [] kernel_init+0x18/0x108 > [ 0.099238] [] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 > > (It's not very apparent from the OF documentation that of_node_put() is > not needed; the macro itself has no docstring and of_get_next_child() > used in the implementation begins with "Returns a node pointer with > refcount incremented" but then only at the very end of the docstring > the crucial part "Decrements the refcount of prev" is mentioned.) Yeah, this kind of mistake has been going around for a while. There's even a semantic patch that fixes this kind of error (see (scripts/coccinelle/iterators/device_node_continue.cocci). I wonder if adding kerneldoc to for_each_child_of_node() may help avoid this kind of mistake in the future. > Fixes: a38045121bf42 ("soc/tegra: pmc: Add generic PM domain support") > Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen > --- > Compile tested only (backtrace received via a distro bug report). > --- > drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Thierry