From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: Fix probe deferral following prelink failure Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:19:55 +0700 Message-ID: <20190402091955.GE2059@sirena.org.uk> References: <1551706274-22571-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <4eb94b41-7e16-7b39-5c14-a7d180ce67df@nvidia.com> <20190402043509.GQ2059@sirena.org.uk> <2d8a0569-b821-c0c0-af39-d3863d17f47f@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tpXFRyzAyQ/GSAaD" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2d8a0569-b821-c0c0-af39-d3863d17f47f@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Curtis Malainey , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org --tpXFRyzAyQ/GSAaD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:52:15AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 02/04/2019 05:35, Mark Brown wrote: > > I don't have this patch at all AFAICT. > That's odd. It is definitely in -next and I did receive an 'applied' > email from you [0]. So looks like something went wrong here. Can we get > this into v5.1? Oh, if I've applied that's why I don't have it any more. Indeed it's applied in my 5.1 branch so I don't know what you're expecting here? --tpXFRyzAyQ/GSAaD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlyjKToACgkQJNaLcl1U h9C44wf+IAgKYLt9gaomDLHoupiqqE5n81Hc70YYK0P/YD8IsMTzUvA/jUPrnYnF kyBCu27wTkzTMK2x6lKN/YublQPJxAEbWtjqT+2NuEqSRXLQvJ5Wmv8dc6gmZJLT QxqhB4pWVMucX25QOqyUMhs8ZXIBxHU2Bj1pjGqrNMTltYFsvxiNpP7Y6B3QJXgI 2NPDzP39tZ+pqywYikJ9ke4AYoBlgrToFHVt5nRxnGOsBFZRlMZ9NQvWYC3fzqJ/ 80rwPgXEsfUiRe+f4hd3ianW4CQaJEaRaY4ag6yno+gzyIg6trbs2G5Wy0Q0VooF k+NzaCaGYcQBnmdRhZKr67cSmPzX1w== =cNSi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tpXFRyzAyQ/GSAaD--