From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.3 00/21] 5.3.1-stable review
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:24:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190920142432.GA601228@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572eca6e-47a9-c554-c6b2-bafd4c5df18b@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 19/09/2019 23:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.3.1 release.
> > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat 21 Sep 2019 09:44:25 PM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.3.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.3.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> No new regressions* for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v5.3:
> 12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail
> 22 boots: 22 pass, 0 fail
> 38 tests: 37 pass, 1 fail
>
> Linux version: 5.3.1-rc1-g0aa7f3d6baae
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> * Note we had one regression in v5.3 for a warnings test for Tegra194
> causing the above test failure. This has since been fixed by the
> following commits [0] but given it is just a warning, I have not
> bothered CC'ing for stable.
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/21/602
I'll be glad to take this in stable for 5.3.y, what is the git commit
id?
Also, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
>
> --
> nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-20 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190919214657.842130855@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-20 13:54 ` [PATCH 5.3 00/21] 5.3.1-stable review Jon Hunter
2019-09-20 14:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-09-20 16:01 ` Jon Hunter
2019-09-22 8:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190920142432.GA601228@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).