Linux Tegra architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/639] 4.19.99-stable review
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:41:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200127094142.GA414145@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61b59750-b08f-c4e9-b472-44b1d096f4cf@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 09:38:17AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 26/01/2020 09:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 07:46:47AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On 1/25/20 3:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 24/01/2020 18:07, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/01/2020 17:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 02:50:05PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Greg,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 24/01/2020 09:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.99 release.
> >>>>>>> There are 639 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>>>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>>>>>> let me know.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:26:29 +0000.
> >>>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>>>>>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.99-rc1.gz
> >>>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
> >>>>>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> >>>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> greg k-h
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -------------
> >>>>>>> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>>>>>>      PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The above commit is causing a suspend regression on Tegra124 Jetson-TK1.
> >>>>>> Reverting this on top of v4.19.99-rc1 fixes the issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is also in the 4.14 queue, so should I drop it there too?
> >>>>
> >>>> I did not see any failures with the same board on that branch, so I
> >>>> would say no, but odd that it only fails here. It was failing for me
> >>>> 100% so I would have expected to see if there too if it was a problem.
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm, rc2 still not working for me ...
> >>>
> >>> Test results for stable-v4.19:
> >>>      11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
> >>>      22 boots:	22 pass, 0 fail
> >>>      32 tests:	30 pass, 2 fail
> >>>
> >>> Linux version:	4.19.99-rc2-g24832ad2c623
> >>> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> >>>                  tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> >>>                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
> >>>
> >>> I still see the following commit in rc2 ...
> >>>
> >>> commit bb52152abe85f971278a7a4f033b29483f64bfdb
> >>> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>> Date:   Thu Jun 13 23:59:45 2019 +0200
> >>>
> >>>      PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle
> > 
> > Yes, I did not change anything in -rc2 for you, sorry.
> > 
> >>> BTW, I checked the 4.14. queue and I do not see the above change in
> >>> there, however, there is similar change ...
> >>>
> >>> Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>>      PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue
> >>>
> >> bb52152abe85 fixes this one, which in turn fixes 33e4f80ee69b.
> >> The above in 4.14 but not its fixes is spelling a bit of trouble.
> >>
> >> Maybe commit 471a739a47aa7 ("PCI: PM: Avoid skipping bus-level
> >> PM on platforms without ACPI") was added to -rc2, since it is
> >> supposed to fix bb52152abe85.
> > 
> > I have added that fix to 4.14 now, and will go push out a -rc3 for both
> > 4.19.y and 4.14.y to try to sync up on this and figure it out.
> > 
> > Jon, if you could retest 4.14.y, that would be great, to see if it has
> > the same issue that 4.19.y has.  And if so, that means I should probably
> > just drop both patches from both trees, right?
> 
> 
> So v4.19 is still failing for me ...
> 
> Test results for stable-v4.19:
>     11 builds:  11 pass, 0 fail
>     22 boots:   22 pass, 0 fail
>     32 tests:   30 pass, 2 fail
> 
> Linux version:  4.19.99-rc3-g041f280e6a1a
> Boards tested:  tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>                 tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>                 tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
> 
> However, I am not seeing any issues with v4.14, so still not clear what
> is going on here.

Ugh, odd.  Ok, I'll go drop both patches from both trees and do some
releases in a few hours and then try adding them back so we can do a bit
more debugging without the deadline of the release being on us.

thanks so much for letting me know!

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2020-01-27  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200124093047.008739095@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-01-24 14:50 ` [PATCH 4.19 000/639] 4.19.99-stable review Jon Hunter
2020-01-24 17:36   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-24 18:07     ` Jon Hunter
     [not found]       ` <8a782263-aca3-3846-12a0-4eb21f015894-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2020-01-25 11:32         ` Jon Hunter
     [not found]           ` <87fcb1f0-b1b8-a6e2-b8f6-b95a07f67919-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2020-01-25 15:46             ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-26  9:13               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-27  9:38                 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-27  9:41                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200127094142.GA414145@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@kernelci.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox